On Fri, 2014-09-12 at 14:53 -0700, Daniel Kang wrote:
> >
> > >All processors supporing mmx2 also support cmov, so if a test for
> > mmx2
> succeeds, we can use cmov.
>
> Since I originally thought mmx => cmov (and apparently am wrong) is
> there
> official documentation supporting this?
>
As
On Fri, 12 Sep 2014, Daniel Kang wrote:
> > All processors supporing mmx2 also support cmov, so if a test for mmx2
> > succeeds, we can use cmov.
> Since I originally thought mmx => cmov (and apparently am wrong) is there
> official documentation supporting this?
There is no official document
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Daniel Kang
wrote:
>>All processors supporing mmx2 also support cmov, so if a test for mmx2
> succeeds, we can use cmov.
>
> Since I originally thought mmx => cmov (and apparently am wrong) is there
> official documentation supporting this?
CMOV was introduced in
>All processors supporing mmx2 also support cmov, so if a test for mmx2
succeeds, we can use cmov.
Since I originally thought mmx => cmov (and apparently am wrong) is there
official documentation supporting this?
___
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-deve
On 12/09/14 4:50 PM, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> There are MMX processors that don't support CMOV (pentium-mmx, amd-k6, cyrix
> 6x86). Therefore, we must not use cmov in in MMX code.
>
> All processors supporing mmx2 also support cmov, so if a test for mmx2
> succeeds,
> we can use cmov.
>
> ---
>
There are MMX processors that don't support CMOV (pentium-mmx, amd-k6, cyrix
6x86). Therefore, we must not use cmov in in MMX code.
All processors supporing mmx2 also support cmov, so if a test for mmx2 succeeds,
we can use cmov.
---
libavcodec/x86/h264_idct.asm |6 ++
1 file changed, 6
