2017-02-11 19:05 GMT+08:00 Michael Niedermayer :
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 11:57:31AM +0800, Steven Liu wrote:
> > 2017-02-11 11:14 GMT+08:00 Michael Niedermayer :
> >
> > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 04:43:17PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> > > > On 2/10/2017 4:03 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > >
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 11:57:31AM +0800, Steven Liu wrote:
> 2017-02-11 11:14 GMT+08:00 Michael Niedermayer :
>
> > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 04:43:17PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> > > On 2/10/2017 4:03 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > > Hi community
> > > >
> > > > what do you prefer about the
2017-02-11 11:14 GMT+08:00 Michael Niedermayer :
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 04:43:17PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> > On 2/10/2017 4:03 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > Hi community
> > >
> > > what do you prefer about the ffmpeg-security alias ?
> > > in no particular order
> > >
> > > Should e
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 04:43:17PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> On 2/10/2017 4:03 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > Hi community
> >
> > what do you prefer about the ffmpeg-security alias ?
> > in no particular order
> >
> > Should everyone on the alias be listed in MAINTAINERs under a
> > ffmpeg
On 2/10/2017 4:03 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi community
>
> what do you prefer about the ffmpeg-security alias ?
> in no particular order
>
> Should everyone on the alias be listed in MAINTAINERs under a
> ffmpeg-security point?
I'd say yes. From a transparency PoV, people should know wh
Hi community
what do you prefer about the ffmpeg-security alias ?
in no particular order
Should everyone on the alias be listed in MAINTAINERs under a
ffmpeg-security point?
Should for everyone who is on the alias a reason be listed in
MAINTAINERs why (s)he is on the alias ?
Should everyone on
>
> > >
> > > I dont think we should give access to ffmpeg-security to everyone who
> > > wants to be on the list. This is of course something the community
> > > has to decide and not me, iam just err-ing on the safe side and am very
> > > restrictive on who is added.
> > >
> >
> > This is a bogus
On 2/9/2017 10:24 AM, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
>>
>> I dont think we should give access to ffmpeg-security to everyone who
>> wants to be on the list. This is of course something the community
>> has to decide and not me, iam just err-ing on the safe side and am very
>> restrictive on who is added.
>>
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 03:29:40PM +0100, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> On 2/9/17, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 08:25:43AM +0100, wm4 wrote:
> >> On Wed, 8 Feb 2017 22:07:24 +0100
> >> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi all
> >> >
> >> > On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 03:51:11AM
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 09:07:39AM -0500, Compn wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Feb 2017 13:24:53 +, Kieran Kunhya
> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > I dont think we should give access to ffmpeg-security to everyone who
> > > wants to be on the list. This is of course something the community
> > > has to decide and
On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 15:27:03 +0100
Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 08:25:43AM +0100, wm4 wrote:
> > On Wed, 8 Feb 2017 22:07:24 +0100
> > Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all
> > >
> > > On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 03:51:11AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > >
On 2/9/17, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 08:25:43AM +0100, wm4 wrote:
>> On Wed, 8 Feb 2017 22:07:24 +0100
>> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>
>> > Hi all
>> >
>> > On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 03:51:11AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> > > On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 07:46:55PM -
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 08:25:43AM +0100, wm4 wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Feb 2017 22:07:24 +0100
> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>
> > Hi all
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 03:51:11AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 07:46:55PM -0400, compn wrote:
> > > > hello,
> > > >
>
On Thu, 09 Feb 2017 13:24:53 +, Kieran Kunhya
wrote:
> >
> > I dont think we should give access to ffmpeg-security to everyone who
> > wants to be on the list. This is of course something the community
> > has to decide and not me, iam just err-ing on the safe side and am very
> > restrictive
>
> I dont think we should give access to ffmpeg-security to everyone who
> wants to be on the list. This is of course something the community
> has to decide and not me, iam just err-ing on the safe side and am very
> restrictive on who is added.
>
This is a bogus argument considering how many pe
On Wed, 8 Feb 2017 22:07:24 +0100
Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi all
>
> On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 03:51:11AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 07:46:55PM -0400, compn wrote:
> > > hello,
> > >
> > > some of you know that we have a list for security / CVE issues.
>
Hi all
On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 03:51:11AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 07:46:55PM -0400, compn wrote:
> > hello,
> >
> > some of you know that we have a list for security / CVE issues.
> > some of you did not know this.
> >
> > i think it is a private list due to n
On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 07:46:55PM -0400, compn wrote:
> hello,
>
> some of you know that we have a list for security / CVE issues.
> some of you did not know this.
>
> i think it is a private list due to not wanting people to make exploits
> before we have a chance to fix them. of course, if no
hello,
some of you know that we have a list for security / CVE issues.
some of you did not know this.
i think it is a private list due to not wanting people to make exploits
before we have a chance to fix them. of course, if no one is subscribed
to review/fix issues then they will never get fixed
19 matches
Mail list logo
