On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 7:44 AM, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 07:40:53AM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 6:02 AM, Michael Niedermayer
>> wrote:
>>
>> > +for (i = 0; i < 20; i++)
>> > +c->scale_tab[i] = ceil(ff_exp10(i * 0.1)
On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 07:40:53AM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 6:02 AM, Michael Niedermayer
> wrote:
>
> > +for (i = 0; i < 20; i++)
> > +c->scale_tab[i] = ceil(ff_exp10(i * 0.1) * 16 - 0.01) / 32;
> > for (; i < 128; i++)
> > +c->sca
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 6:02 AM, Michael Niedermayer
wrote:
> +for (i = 0; i < 20; i++)
> +c->scale_tab[i] = ceil(ff_exp10(i * 0.1) * 16 - 0.01) / 32;
> for (; i < 128; i++)
> +c->scale_tab[i] = ceil(ff_exp10(i * 0.1) * 0.5 - 0.01);
>
To innocent bystanders, this is
From: Michael Niedermayer
This also simplifies the code
the resulting values are binary identical to what pow(10, i/10.0) produces
---
libavcodec/on2avc.c | 37 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavcodec/on2avc.c b/libavcodec