Re: filmscanners: Ektachrome E100VS bad?

2001-05-22 Thread Arthur Entlich
Kevin Power wrote: > I've had superb results with it, but it was sent to pro lab for development. > > E100VS is the only Kodak product I use these days, when appropriate. It is, to me, nearly a faster Velvia analogue. I've been pleased with it, and yes, the colors are quite saturated (V-

Re: filmscanners: Ektachrome E100VS bad?

2001-05-22 Thread Rob Geraghty
Joel wrote: >landscape. The E100VS can be a little OTT in really warm light I tried one roll after the lab raved about it. Some photos I took of a sunset have saturated in quite bizarre ways. It's interesting, but I still prefer Fuji films. Another thing which was a problem was that the film

Re: filmscanners: Ektachrome E100VS bad?

2001-05-22 Thread Joel Wilcox
>From: Roger Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Anybody out there used Kodak's E100VS film? Roger, I use this film in addition to Provia F and Velvia. I prefer Velvia for landscape. The E100VS can be a little OTT in really warm light, but it is often very good in flat light that can make Provia

Re: filmscanners: Ektachrome E100VS bad?

2001-05-22 Thread Kevin Power
I've had superb results with it, but it was sent to pro lab for development. - Original Message - From: "Roger Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 9:59 PM Subject: filmscanners: Ektachrome E100VS bad? > Anybody