> > I was referring *specifically* to the combination of Athlon/x
> > motherboard/W2K.
>
> And
>
> > PRECISELY MY POINT - dear oh dear, some Athlon chipsets (KT133A, say)
> don't
> > get on with W2K.
>
> I have an Athalon 1.33 and a KT133A motherboard running W2K. Also
> running a
> load of USB &
> > I have an Athalon 1.33 and a KT133A motherboard running W2K. Also
> > running a
> > load of USB & SCSI perhipherals, as well as firewire for a Nikon
scanner.
> > There is nothing inherently wrong with this combination. It works
> > as well as
> > I could want it to.
>
> http://hardocp.com/revi
> At 21:49 02-08-01 +0100, Jawed Ashraf wrote:
> >I saw benchmarks of a 1.3GHz Athlon outperforming a 1.7GHz P4 in
> >Photoshop... Wish I knew where they were now.
>
> Possibly here:
> Choosing the Best Platform for Adobe Photoshop
> http://www.xbitlabs.com/cpu/photoshop-platform/
That wasn't i
n the bottom - L. )
Geoff
www.geoffmurray.com
- Original Message -
From: "Herm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 7:31 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: RE: Custom PC spec
> memory is super cheap right now, a 256mb module is only
> I was referring *specifically* to the combination of Athlon/x
> motherboard/W2K.
And
> PRECISELY MY POINT - dear oh dear, some Athlon chipsets (KT133A, say)
don't
> get on with W2K.
I have an Athalon 1.33 and a KT133A motherboard running W2K. Also running a
load of USB & SCSI perhipherals, as
>
> At 21:24 01-08-01 +0100, Jawed Ashraf wrote:
> >The Athlon/RAM combination is very good value at the moment
> (actually that
> >combination is silly money). If you buy as a complete system you should
> >have no trouble - though it is fair to say that W2K and some varieties of
> >Athlon mother
At 21:24 01-08-01 +0100, Jawed Ashraf wrote:
>The Athlon/RAM combination is very good value at the moment (actually that
>combination is silly money). If you buy as a complete system you should
>have no trouble - though it is fair to say that W2K and some varieties of
>Athlon motherboard do not g
memory is super cheap right now, a 256mb module is only $34.. so stock up, your
new motherboard should handle 3 modules, for a total of 768mb of memory.
You should also make sure you get a fast hard drive, usually 7200rpm and ATA100.
I like IBM drives.
"Cooke, Julie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've got a Celeron 466 with 128MB of RAM and recently bought a Nikon
> Coolscan LS4000. I think it's time to upgrade my machine! I've concluded
> that I need a custom built machine with a graphics card where the look up
> table can be calibrated
I am missing something here? I think you'll fi
Matrox is fine.
With Windows 2000, since your file sizes are ~70MB, why not 1GB of RAM? RAM
is dirt cheap these days.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Cooke, Julie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 12:50 PM
Subject: fi
Cooke, Julie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 1:50 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: filmscanners: RE: Custom PC spec
I've got a Celeron 466 with 128MB of RAM and recently bought a Nikon
Coolscan LS4000. I think it's time to upgrade my machine!
I've got a Celeron 466 with 128MB of RAM and recently bought a Nikon
Coolscan LS4000. I think it's time to upgrade my machine! I've concluded
that I need a custom built machine with a graphics card where the look up
table can be calibrated and a high end monitor.
Can anyone recommend graphics ca
12 matches
Mail list logo
