ject: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: VueScan 7.2.11
Available (new focus test)
> Brian wrote:
> >actually polar coordinates might be more applicable in this case.
>
> It still comes back to the question of - relative to what? The
orientation
> according to the scanner, or
Brian wrote:
>actually polar coordinates might be more applicable in this case.
It still comes back to the question of - relative to what? The orientation
according to the scanner, or that displayed on the screen? Having a graphical
interface with the ability to click on a point is harder to co
, December 06, 2001 12:55 AM
Subject: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: VueScan 7.2.11 Available (new focus
test)
> Julian wrote:
> > Maybe we should ask Ed to use complex numbers (x +iy)
> > to represent the focus points
>
> I doubt that many folks on the list would have h
And mathematicians. And as a maverick Aero engineer, I knew about them too.
Hersch
At 03:55 PM 12/06/2001 +1000, you wrote:
>Julian wrote:
> > Maybe we should ask Ed to use complex numbers (x +iy)
> > to represent the focus points
>
>I doubt that many folks on the list would have heard of im
Julian wrote:
> Maybe we should ask Ed to use complex numbers (x +iy)
> to represent the focus points
I doubt that many folks on the list would have heard of imaginary numbers,
but I could be wrong - there's a few electrical engineers out there I think!
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
