Hello,
I'm not very experienced in digital imaging and have a question which
probably has been discussed before.
I use an Nikon LS30 scanner to produce 48 bit tiffs with vuescan. Then I
tweak the images in PS6. Is it better to do all possible tweaking in 48 bit
mode, one after the other, which nee
Andreas wrote:
>Another question about vuescan: The LS30 internally uses 10 bit, the output
>is just an 8 bit file. Vuescan produces images in 16 bit mode by rerendering
>the file if I understood right. Has this file really more information than
>the 8 bit file the scanner itself outputs?
Yes. T
Thank you Michael and Rob for your advices.
shAf :o) writes...
>...
> Regarding editing 16bit (or highbits) versus 8bits and using
>adjustment layers (available in 8bit mode only) ... it is a toss-up.
>If you were editing 12bits or true 16bits, I might go with individual
>highbit adjustmen
Andreas writes ...
> ...
> I use an Nikon LS30 scanner to produce 48 bit tiffs with
> vuescan. Then I tweak the images in PS6.
> Is it better to do all possible tweaking in 48 bit
> mode, one after the other, which needs rendering the
> picture each time, or is it better to convert the
> image to
Title: RE: filmscanners: Tweaking images in PS6
I think i read something about this in the Photoshop for Photographers book. Converting to 16bit colour and doing colour levels and curves and then converting back to 8bit produced a "better looking histogram" than if the adjustments
Andreas writes ...
> shAf :o) writes...
> >...
> > ... Each image, highbits vs 8bits, and the adjustments
> >needed, would need individual attention ... but given only 10bits,
I'd
> >have a hard time NOT using adjustment layers and 8bits.
>
> If I understood you right, saving highbit files doe
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001 23:52:18 +0100 Andreas Kurz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Is it better to do all possible tweaking in 48 bit
> mode, one after the other, which needs rendering the picture each time, or
> is it better to convert the image to 8 bit and use adjustment layers which
> renders the
-Original Message-
>> Is it better to do all possible tweaking in 48 bit
>> mode, one after the other, which needs rendering the picture each
time, or
>> is it better to convert the image to 8 bit and use adjustment
layers which
>> renders the image just once.
>48bit, definitely, is bett
>
> I experimented with correcting old Ek slides using layers in PS and
> found that when printed on an EPSON 870, it appeared that there was a
> greenish layer over the original image. When I worked on the image
> directly and printed it on the same printer it looked normal, i.e. no
> green haze
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001 23:47:58 -0600 Jan/Orion Knox
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I experimented with correcting old Ek slides using layers in PS and
> found that when printed on an EPSON 870, it appeared that there was a
> greenish layer over the original image. When I worked on the image
> direct
10 matches
Mail list logo
