Re: [Fink-devel] lib install_name changing from absolute path to @rpath

2015-07-07 Thread Hanspeter Niederstrasser
On Mon, July 6, 2015 4:31 pm, Daniel Johnson wrote: > >> On Jul 6, 2015, at 1:46 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser >> wrote: >> >> If a library changes its install_name from /absolute/path/to/foo.X.dylib >> to @rpath/foo.X.dylib (X is the same, c_v is bumped), does this need a >> new >> libN package n

Re: [Fink-devel] lib install_name changing from absolute path to @rpath

2015-07-06 Thread Daniel Johnson
> On Jul 6, 2015, at 1:46 PM, Hanspeter Niederstrasser > wrote: > > If a library changes its install_name from /absolute/path/to/foo.X.dylib > to @rpath/foo.X.dylib (X is the same, c_v is bumped), does this need a new > libN package name? The file is installed to the same location, so packages

[Fink-devel] lib install_name changing from absolute path to @rpath

2015-07-06 Thread Hanspeter Niederstrasser
If a library changes its install_name from /absolute/path/to/foo.X.dylib to @rpath/foo.X.dylib (X is the same, c_v is bumped), does this need a new libN package name? The file is installed to the same location, so packages linking to the old absolute path dylib should still be able to find the new