We will have to give some serious consideration to
using Apple gcc-4.2 compiler from Xcode = 3.1 shortly.
The ppl cvs which will become the next ppl release requires
gcc 4.0.3 to build. This means that ppl 0.9 will no
longer build against Apple's stock gcc 4.0.1 compiler.
It does build fine
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jack Howarth wrote:
|We will have to give some serious consideration to
| using Apple gcc-4.2 compiler from Xcode = 3.1 shortly.
| The ppl cvs which will become the next ppl release requires
| gcc 4.0.3 to build. This means that ppl 0.9 will no
Benjamin,
The current Xcode 3.1.1 DP1 can't compile the ppl cvs.
The response from the ppl developer was...
---
Jack Howarth wrote:
The ppl cvs only builds with the newer Apple gcc-4.2 compiler
in Xcode 3.1. Under the default gcc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jack Howarth wrote:
|I also recall having one of my bug reports against code
| generation of the Apple gcc 4.0.1 compiler closed with a
| comment that the compiler was depreciated or such. I agree
| that we can just build ppl 0.9 with gcc-4.2
Benjamin Reed wrote:
[]
As I'm not a compiler guru, I must be missing something. Is PPL
something that is part of the GCC build? Googling PPL gives me a
million false positives.
And fink apropos ppl shows nothing called ppl.
What *is* ppl?
--
Martin
Martin Costabel wrote:
Benjamin Reed wrote:
[]
As I'm not a compiler guru, I must be missing something. Is PPL
something that is part of the GCC build? Googling PPL gives me a
million false positives.
And fink apropos ppl shows nothing called ppl.
What *is* ppl?
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 03:53:47PM -0400, Benjamin Reed wrote:
Jack Howarth wrote:
| Benjamin,
| If it is a 10.5-gcc-4.2 branch, I would assume by default it
| would be an opt in. Besides, I would surprised if Apple doesn't switch
| the default compiler to gcc-4.2 for Snow Leopard so we
