Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Bug in as from Dec2002gccUpdater.pkg

2003-07-27 Thread Martin Costabel
Andrew Pinski wrote: Just to keep you guys up to date on this problem, this is fixed in the FSF's CVS version of gcc by: . Thanks for the information. Since this patch does not apply directly to the gcc-3.3 sources, I changed it somewhat so

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Bug in as from Dec2002gccUpdater.pkg

2003-07-27 Thread Andrew Pinski
Just to keep you guys up to date on this problem, this is fixed in the FSF's CVS version of gcc by: . Thanks, Andrew Pinski On Tuesday, Jul 1, 2003, at 10:25 US/Eastern, Andrew Pinski wrote: A workaround is to use -mdynamic-no-pic (that

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Bug in as from Dec2002gccUpdater.pkg

2003-07-01 Thread Martin Costabel
Andrew Pinski wrote: A workaround is to use -mdynamic-no-pic (that even speeds up your programs). Note -mdynamic-no-pic should not be used with shared libraries, also it is not in the FSF's gcc until 3.4 (aka it is in the cvs). So this is not a usable workaround right now. Fink will have to do

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Bug in as from Dec2002gccUpdater.pkg

2003-07-01 Thread Andrew Pinski
A workaround is to use -mdynamic-no-pic (that even speeds up your programs). Note -mdynamic-no-pic should not be used with shared libraries, also it is not in the FSF's gcc until 3.4 (aka it is in the cvs). I have filed a bug with the FSF, http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11387 because I still think this i

Re: [Fink-devel] Re: Bug in as from Dec2002gccUpdater.pkg

2003-07-01 Thread Max Horn
Am Dienstag, 01.07.03 um 10:04 Uhr schrieb Martin Costabel: Andrew Pinski wrote: OK, I hunted it down. It is really too silly: The code produced by a fortran STOP statement (without optional stop-code) is treated as an error by the new assembler. Definitely a bug in as. No because gcc should pr