RE: [flexcoders] Re: Flex 2:Package/Class problem

2005-11-02 Thread Roger Gonzalez
any SWC > > support built-in, so you need to drop down to the command line. > > > > Run compc.exe -i source source source -o mrstd.swc > > > > Go back into FlexBuilder, and remove the mrstd directory from the > > classpath, and add the mrstd.swc file to the librar

[flexcoders] Re: Flex 2:Package/Class problem

2005-11-02 Thread Greg Johnson
.swc file to the library path tab. > > Is this what you need? > > -Roger > > Roger Gonzalez > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg J

RE: [flexcoders] Re: Flex 2:Package/Class problem

2005-11-01 Thread Roger Gonzalez
-Roger Roger Gonzalez mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Johnson > Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 11:45 AM > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Flex 2:Package

[flexcoders] Re: Flex 2:Package/Class problem

2005-11-01 Thread Greg Johnson
Original Message- > > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Johnson > > Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 8:05 AM > > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com > > Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Flex 2:Package/Class problem > > >

RE: [flexcoders] Re: Flex 2:Package/Class problem

2005-11-01 Thread Roger Gonzalez
ubject: [flexcoders] Re: Flex 2:Package/Class problem > > Hmm, well that pokes a hole in that plan. If I have to create a > bunch of different files it kinda is contrary to my goal of combining > things into one main generic library :( > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "G

[flexcoders] Re: Flex 2:Package/Class problem

2005-11-01 Thread Greg Johnson
Hmm, well that pokes a hole in that plan. If I have to create a bunch of different files it kinda is contrary to my goal of combining things into one main generic library :( --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Geoffrey Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You can only have one public funct