"Jim Wilson" wrote:
If it wasn't for the great work on JSBsim and YASim we'd have very
few aircraft. But I think those config files, along with the "source
code" that ends up interpreting and processing them, both make up the
FDMs.
There is considerable skill and effort involved in producing ac
Jon Berndt said:
> > I don't use real weather because most of my flying is to test the fdms I'm
> > working on,
>
> Just so I am clear, when you say "fdms" are you referring to Flight Dynamics
Model source
> code, or are you referring to something I'd call an Aircraft Flight Model
(AFM) or
> Airc
- Original Message -
From: "Lee Elliott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "FlightGear developers discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2004 8:46 AM
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Data source battle?
> On Friday 30 July 2004 23:19, John Wo
On Saturday 31 July 2004 17:02, Jon Berndt wrote:
> > I don't use real weather because most of my flying is to test the fdms
> > I'm working on,
>
> Just so I am clear, when you say "fdms" are you referring to Flight
> Dynamics Model source code, or are you referring to something I'd call an
> Airc
> I don't use real weather because most of my flying is to test the fdms I'm
> working on,
Just so I am clear, when you say "fdms" are you referring to Flight Dynamics Model
source
code, or are you referring to something I'd call an Aircraft Flight Model (AFM) or
Aircraft Flight Model Definition
On Friday 30 July 2004 23:19, John Wojnaroski wrote:
> When using real-time weather via the net and the native-ctrls interface to
> input control data to FG it appears both "sources" attempt to write to the
> environmental properties; this is most noticeable with the wind vector and
> discontinuiti
When using real-time weather via the net and the native-ctrls interface to
input control data to FG it appears both "sources" attempt to write to the
environmental properties; this is most noticeable with the wind vector and
discontinuities in the ground speed
"turning off" the specific wind prope