Mike Krizansky:
I also think that Linux IS the right development platform, but as you
stated, if you feel more confortable with Windows, may be you can
consider the Eclipse + CDT plug-in (as IDE) and MinGW (as compiler)
combination. Both tools are free.
Indeed, and my last option, would be to giv
> I was asking just for a documention how you set up MSVC++ so that it
> compiles FGFS. That would be a nice HOWTO for other developers (we get a
> request for that every few months)
Agreed, I think that would be a nice thing to have. I know that I would
have liked it when I built it :)
Now, I j
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck Cole schrieb:
> I unfortunately do not have an FTP server or the like to make my version
> of the source code available to you. But since you have some time, I
> could simply e-mail you the source code that I have built along with
> some simple
I know you had mentioned MSVC++ as your
desired path. I’m using v.6.0, but I have heard from some that it
is easier to build with Visual C++ .NET (or v.7). There are some threads
in last month’s mailing list archive that discuss building with the .NET
version along with links to establi
, January 05, 2005
6:39 PM
To:
flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Re:
Development Platform Help Needed
Thanks Christian and Chuck,
I think Linux would be the most direct
but my comfort level diminishes rapidly. I would appreciate an
opportunity to review the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Spott schrieb:
> Christian Mayer wrote:
>
>
>>PS: If anybody is wondering why I've got so much time to answer mails:
>>when you are working on your master thesis you've got time for
>>everything but the stuff you should actually do...
My thes
Christian Mayer wrote:
> PS: If anybody is wondering why I've got so much time to answer mails:
> when you are working on your master thesis you've got time for
> everything but the stuff you should actually do...
I think this is common in Germany, because actually you are paid for
everything but
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> Thanks Christian and Chuck,
>
> I think Linux would be the most direct but my comfort level
> diminishes rapidly.
Nowadays Linux is much more userfriendly than what people think.
But I can understand that you'll only want to tackle one "problem" at once.
> I would
Thanks Christian and Chuck,
I think Linux would be the most direct but my comfort level
diminishes rapidly. I would appreciate an opportunity to review
the MSVC++ path if I can get together with Chuck.
Most of this development will take place in Suffolk,
and I'm devoting the entire semes
