Re: [Flightgear-devel] problems experienced with the recent c150 updates

2005-10-23 Thread Dave Culp
> Sometimes at the same time I also see the aircraft tumbling backwards and > having its tail going underground, controls held neutral, tailwind never > exceeding 7 knots. Could this be that the model doesn't account for the > pilot's weight? Tumbling backwards is usually an indication that the a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] problems experienced with the recent c150 updates

2005-10-23 Thread Vassilii Khachaturov
> You are right, for some unknown reason to me I changed the tanks capacity. I wonder if this, along with the empty pilot seat, added to the back-tumbling? BTW, Erik's data at http://www.a1.nl/~ehofman/fgfs/docs/c150.txt also lists a std and long-range configuration (please ignore my c152 data as

Re: [Flightgear-devel] problems experienced with the recent c150 updates

2005-10-23 Thread Erik Hofman
Vassilii Khachaturov wrote: I've tried out the recent c150 updates, and have observed the following problems: Here's the data for the C-150: http://www.a1.nl/~ehofman/fgfs/docs/c150.txt Erik ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flight

Re: [Flightgear-devel] problems experienced with the recent c150 updates

2005-10-23 Thread Harald JOHNSEN
Vassilii Khachaturov wrote: I've tried out the recent c150 updates, and have observed the following problems: 1) the speeds in the help file and on the specially crafted ASI seem different from what the real Cessnas have. C150 was an inferior version to a C152, with all the speeds lower, and sa

[Flightgear-devel] problems experienced with the recent c150 updates

2005-10-23 Thread Vassilii Khachaturov
I've tried out the recent c150 updates, and have observed the following problems: 1) the speeds in the help file and on the specially crafted ASI seem different from what the real Cessnas have. C150 was an inferior version to a C152, with all the speeds lower, and same size tanks. Here's what a 19