"Ampere K. Hardraade" wrote:
> it seem agpgart is still seeing the i810 and not the ATI card.
Did you already give the OpenSource drivers a try ?
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
---
No.
How do I do so?
Ampere
On November 3, 2004 12:41 pm, Martin Spott wrote:
> "Ampere K. Hardraade" wrote:
> > it seem agpgart is still seeing the i810 and not the ATI card.
>
> Did you already give the OpenSource drivers a try ?
>
> Martin.
___
Flig
"Ampere K. Hardraade" wrote:
> On November 3, 2004 12:41 pm, Martin Spott wrote:
> > "Ampere K. Hardraade" wrote:
> > > it seem agpgart is still seeing the i810 and not the ATI card.
> >
> > Did you already give the OpenSource drivers a try ?
> No.
>
> How do I do so?
Install XFree86 or better X
If you are referring the "radeon" driver, itI am using it at the moment and it
doesn't give me direct rendering either.
Ampere
On November 3, 2004 03:15 pm, Martin Spott wrote:
> Install XFree86 or better XOrg from your favorite Linux distribution
> and adjust your 'XF86Config' or 'xorg.conf' ac
"Ampere K. Hardraade" wrote:
> If you are referring the "radeon" driver, itI am using it at the moment and it
> doesn't give me direct rendering either.
I have to guess what you're meaning Could you post the "Device"
and the "DRI" section of your XF86Config ? Simply use cut 'n paste so I
do
Section "Device"
Identifier "Generic Video Card"
Driver "radeon"
EndSection
Section "Monitor"
Identifier "SyncMaster"
HorizSync 30-60
VertRefresh 56-75
Option "DPMS"
EndSection
Section "Screen"
Identifie
If I keep the "radeon" in the driver section, the config file isn't read at
all. Therefore, I changed it back to ati.
Ampere
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2
"Ampere K. Hardraade" wrote:
> Section "Device"
> Identifier "Generic Video Card"
> Driver "radeon"
> EndSection
This is not very much, although it _might_ work. You'd be better done
with adding a BusID and a Screen.
"Ampere K. Hardraade" wrote:
> If I keep the "rade
On November 4, 2004 06:26 am, Martin Spott wrote:
> "Ampere K. Hardraade" wrote:
> > Section "Device"
> > Identifier "Generic Video Card"
> > Driver "radeon"
> > EndSection
>
> This is not very much, although it _might_ work. You'd be better done
> with adding a BusID
Any idea what the first few lines are saying?
Ampere
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose glxinfo
name of display: :0.0
libGL: XF86DRIGetClientDriverName: 4.0.1 r200 (screen 0)
libGL: OpenDriver: trying /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/r200_dri.so
libGL error: dlopen /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/r200
Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
> Any idea what the first few lines are saying?
>
> Ampere
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose glxinfo
> name of display: :0.0
> libGL: XF86DRIGetClientDriverName: 4.0.1 r200 (screen 0)
> libGL: OpenDriver: trying /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/r200_dri.so
> libGL e
"Ampere K. Hardraade" wrote:
> Any idea what the first few lines are saying?
> Ampere
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose glxinfo
> name of display: :0.0
> libGL: XF86DRIGetClientDriverName: 4.0.1 r200 (screen 0)
> libGL: OpenDriver: trying /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/r200_dri.so
> libGL er
Still no luck with direct rendering. If I use the one from XFree86, direct
rendering will get enabled, but the framerate is so poor that even my i810
can beat it. If I use the one from fglrx, it is error after error after
error. Sigh... and I thought ATI is supposed to be Linux-friendly?!
An
Whoops... wrong XF86Log.
This is a pre-release version of XFree86, and is not supported in any
way. Bugs may be reported to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and patches submitted
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Before reporting bugs in pre-release versions,
please check the latest version in the XFree86 CVS repository
(h
"Ampere K. Hardraade" wrote:
> Still no luck with direct rendering. If I use the one from XFree86, direct
> rendering will get enabled, but the framerate is so poor that even my i810
> can beat it. If I use the one from fglrx, it is error after error after
> error. Sigh... and I thought ATI i
Well, the r200 driver did work, but for some reason it only gave me ~200 fps
at the most. =(
Ampere
On November 8, 2004 03:28 am, Martin Spott wrote:
> Things have changed a bit these days, but the r200 chip is still one of
> the best supported GPU's in the OpenSource world. The problem on _your
Fresh Linux installation, but I'm still getting this:
(II) fglrx(0): [agp] AGP v1/2 disable mask 0x
(II) fglrx(0): [agp] AGP v3 disable mask 0x
(EE) fglrx(0): [agp] could not determine AGP since mode=0x
(EE) fglrx(0): cannot init AGP
Ampere
_
"Ampere K. Hardraade" wrote:
> Fresh Linux installation, but I'm still getting this:
> (II) fglrx(0): [agp] AGP v1/2 disable mask 0x
^
Your fault - isn't it ? If you need support for a closed source driver,
then please call the vendor and stop annoying people on an OpenSource
ma
On November 9, 2004 01:07 am, Martin Spott wrote:
> "Ampere K. Hardraade" wrote:
> > Fresh Linux installation, but I'm still getting this:
> >
> > (II) fglrx(0): [agp] AGP v1/2 disable mask 0x
>
>^
> Your fault - isn't it ? If you need support for a closed source driver,
> then
"Ampere K. Hardraade" wrote:
> I have finally got direct rendering working by apt-getting xlibmesa-dri.
> glxgears only runs at ~200 fps though. :-/
Do you find something similar to this in your /var/log/messages ?
Nov 13 19:28:04 quickstep kernel: [drm:radeon_unlock] *ERROR* Process 1000
usi
Yes. I keep getting that among other errors when I was trying to get fglrx
working, but I don't think that line is much of an issue.
Ampere
On November 13, 2004 01:40 pm, Martin Spott wrote:
> Do you find something similar to this in your /var/log/messages ?
>
> Nov 13 19:28:04 quickstep kernel
"Ampere K. Hardraade" wrote:
> On November 13, 2004 01:40 pm, Martin Spott wrote:
> > Do you find something similar to this in your /var/log/messages ?
> >
> > Nov 13 19:28:04 quickstep kernel: [drm:radeon_unlock] *ERROR* Process 1000
> > using kernel context 0
> Yes. I keep getting that among ot
"Ampere K. Hardraade" wrote:
> Thanks for helping me out on this problem. So far, I have tried:
I believe you want to dump the commercial ATI driver for the Radeon9200
i favour of the OpenSource alternative. I realize that I should
overhaul the chapter on ATI cards in "the manual"
A typical
Sure. Every little bit helps.
Ampere
On October 30, 2004 01:17 pm, Martin Spott wrote:
> I could 'lend' you my 'xorg.conf' that I use on a customers's PeeCee if
> you are ready to wait until tuesday,
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Martin Spott wrote:
> I could 'lend' you my 'xorg.conf' that I use on a customers's PeeCee if
> you are ready to wait until tuesday,
http://document.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/Misc/xorg.conf.r200
I states "SaX generated" but most of the stuff is the result of manual
editing :-)
Martin.
--
Unix _I
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 01:51:52 -0400, Ampere wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thanks for helping me out on this problem. So far, I have tried:
> - compiling agpgart as builtin and as a module
> - compiling with and without DRM
> - enabling and disabling the "useinternalagpart" in XF86Config
I have removed fglrx completely and use the driver from XFree86 instead. The
good news is that I have stopped getting errors in XFree86.0.log. The bad
news is that I still don't have direct rendering.
Ampere
On October 30, 2004 04:11 pm, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> ..according to your lspci -v,
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 19:39:42 -0400, Ampere wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On October 30, 2004 04:11 pm, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > ..according to your lspci -v, you have both an ATI card and an
> > Intel 82845G/GL[Brookdale-G] integrated card, and AFAICT, a
> > propeller head driver fro
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 01:49:53 -0400, Ampere wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On October 30, 2004 10:32 pm, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 19:39:42 -0400, Ampere wrote in message
> >
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > On October 30, 2004 04:11 pm, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > > > ..accord
When I type glxinfo | grep rendering, I got:
direct rendering: No
Ampere
On November 1, 2004 02:23 pm, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> ..and your log mentions "Acceleration enabled". ;-)
>
> --
> ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
> ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ance
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 19:53:15 -0500, Ampere wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On November 1, 2004 02:23 pm, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > ..and your log mentions "Acceleration enabled". ;-)
>
> When I type glxinfo | grep rendering, I got:
> direct rendering: No
..huh? 'glxgears ' says? I als
31 matches
Mail list logo
