Hi Andy,
Thanks for that! So just to clarify -- this is a bug in Yasim code (or
more like a missing feature) and I'm welcome to fix it? :)
Cheers,
Vik
On 07/05/2012 09:34 PM, Andy Ross wrote:
> (Happened to be browsing in time to see a question)
>
> On 07/05/2012 06:21 AM, Viktor Radnai wrote:
Curtis Olson wrote:
> [...] or scenery GPL? :-)
Who cares about Scenery >;-)
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--
--
(Happened to be browsing in time to see a question)
On 07/05/2012 06:21 AM, Viktor Radnai wrote:
> I don't see any obvious properties to set to take the engine's
> resistance to turning over, or the friction of the wheels into account
> to stop these unrealistic things from happening. How should I
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Curtis Olson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Martin Spott wrote:
>
>> Hi Curt,
>>
>> Curtis Olson wrote:
>>
>> > We !!!STRONGLY!!! encourage authors to use the GPL [...]
>>
>> except from SimGear, which is supposed to be LGPL, correct ?
>>
>
> Yes.
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Martin Spott wrote:
> Hi Curt,
>
> Curtis Olson wrote:
>
> > We !!!STRONGLY!!! encourage authors to use the GPL [...]
>
> except from SimGear, which is supposed to be LGPL, correct ?
>
Yes. :-)
Curt.
--
Curtis Olson:
http://www.atiak.com - http://aem.umn.e
Hi Curt,
Curtis Olson wrote:
> We !!!STRONGLY!!! encourage authors to use the GPL [...]
except from SimGear, which is supposed to be LGPL, correct ?
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
-
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Stefan Seifert wrote:
> On Thursday 05 July 2012 07:50:20 Michael wrote:
>
> > Everything on GPL only means:
> > - less scenery and airplanes included ( wasn't there recently some
> > photoscenery rejected because of the GPL?)
>
> There are already 565 airplanes to
On Thursday 05 July 2012 07:50:20 Michael wrote:
> Everything on GPL only means:
> - less scenery and airplanes included ( wasn't there recently some
> photoscenery rejected because of the GPL?)
There are already 565 airplanes to choose from in git (all licensed GPL). More
than enough for me, if
The plane gets pushed either forward or backwards by the wind, depending
on the wind direction. The prop seems to only get turned in the
direction of normal rotation, even in a tailwind, which seems wrong to me.
But really the main issue for me is that this amount of wind should not
move the ai
You mean when the wind is blowing from the front-left of the plane?
Cheers,
Vik
On 07/05/2012 04:14 PM, Hyde Yamakawa wrote:
> Does this happen only left wind, right? Or happens on right wind too?
>
> Hyde
>
> (2012年07月05日 10:02), Viktor Radnai wrote:
>> Technically, you also have the compression
>
> And Keep It Stupid Simple (tm). One license is already too
> many licenses.
>
Everything on GPL only means:
- less scenery and airplanes included ( wasn't there recently some photoscenery
rejected because of the GPL?)
- authors lose copyrights
- only to find their work rebranded and sold f
Does this happen only left wind, right? Or happens on right wind too?
Hyde
(2012年07月05日 10:02), Viktor Radnai wrote:
> Technically, you also have the compression of the wheels -- when the
> wheel turns, part of the tire in the front gets compressed while the
> back gets uncompressed. This is also
Technically, you also have the compression of the wheels -- when the
wheel turns, part of the tire in the front gets compressed while the
back gets uncompressed. This is also a friction loss. Plus there is some
friction between the rubber and the road.
But my point is that the amount of frictio
On Thursday 05 July 2012 15:21:24 Viktor Radnai wrote:
> 1. When the aircraft is parked with no parking brake, it will usually
> start to roll slowly backwards -- pushed by the wind and maybe the
> runway slope. If I start the engine on idle, the thrust generated by the
> idle prop might stop this
Hi all,
I have a Yasim question I can't figure out from the documentation. We're
working on the sf25b and noticed that both that, and the Grob g109
(which is a similar aircraft so we use it to reference things) seem to
suffer from "lack of static friction". I might be misinterpreting the
issue
Caster, in particular for nose gear aircraft, seems to me to be broken in
JSBsim. Can anyone confirm this ?
Thanks
Alan--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
16 matches
Mail list logo