[Bug 517789] Droid Sans overrides default Japanese desktop font

2023-05-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517789 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|aekoro...@linux.intel.com |ta...@redhat.com --- Comment #49 from

[Bug 1954359] Many emoji don't show up in Qt apps because qt does not handle 'emoji' font family

2023-05-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1954359 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||i18n -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 517789] Droid Sans overrides default Japanese desktop font

2023-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517789 --- Comment #48 from Jens Petersen --- This seems now a major problem in F38, apparently also affecting zh-TW. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517789 ___

[Bug 2186711] "Open Sans" substitute config affects other languages' default font selection

2023-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186711 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen --- I see Droid being used for Thai also btw, perhaps also related? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186711 __

[Bug 2186711] "Open Sans" substitute config affects other languages' default font selection

2023-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186711 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|aekoro...@linux.intel.com |ta...@redhat.com Priority|uns

[Bug 2123720] Noto Sans Thai to default for Thai

2023-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123720 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Status|ON_QA

[Bug 2123722] Noto Khmer to default for Khmer

2023-05-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123722 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 2093080] Default fonts for Arabic do not match the font packages list

2023-04-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093080 Adam Williamson changed: What|Removed |Added Version|36 |rawhide --- Comment #10 from Adam W

[Bug 1779123] Pango no longer supports type1 fonts

2023-04-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779123 Peng Wu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 2093080] Default fonts for Arabic do not match the font packages list

2023-04-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2093080 --- Comment #9 from Ben Cotton --- This message is a reminder that Fedora Linux 36 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora Linux 36 on 2023-05-16. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports f

[Bug 1813728] Square four dot Unicode character has incorrect glyph

2023-04-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813728 --- Comment #9 from Ben Cotton --- This message is a reminder that Fedora Linux 36 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora Linux 36 on 2023-05-16. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports f

[Bug 1833858] Droid Hangul Jamo is separated and printed respectively

2023-04-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833858 --- Comment #31 from Ben Cotton --- This message is a reminder that Fedora Linux 36 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora Linux 36 on 2023-05-16. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports

[Bug 2129399] Postscript standard symbol font is not looked up correctly

2023-04-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129399 --- Comment #32 from Ben Cotton --- This message is a reminder that Fedora Linux 36 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora Linux 36 on 2023-05-16. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports

[Bug 1999078] Hinting strangely broken in Epiphany

2023-04-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999078 --- Comment #33 from Ben Cotton --- This message is a reminder that Fedora Linux 36 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora Linux 36 on 2023-05-16. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports

[Bug 1898319] dejavu-lgc-sans-mono-fonts: Misleading summary

2023-04-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1898319 --- Comment #5 from Ben Cotton --- This message is a reminder that Fedora Linux 36 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora Linux 36 on 2023-05-16. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports f

[Bug 1779123] Pango no longer supports type1 fonts

2023-04-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779123 --- Comment #14 from Ben Cotton --- This message is a reminder that Fedora Linux 36 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora Linux 36 on 2023-05-16. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports

[Bug 683325] pidgin freezes for some specific messages and window size

2023-04-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683325 --- Comment #37 from Ben Cotton --- This message is a reminder that Fedora Linux 36 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora Linux 36 on 2023-05-16. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports f

[Bug 2164233] FcCacheFini: Assertion `fcCacheChains[i] == NULL' failed.

2023-04-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164233 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|openttd-13.1-1.fc38 |openttd-13.1-1.fc38

[Bug 2164233] FcCacheFini: Assertion `fcCacheChains[i] == NULL' failed.

2023-04-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164233 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|openttd-13.1-1.fc38 |openttd-13.1-1.fc38

[Bug 2164233] FcCacheFini: Assertion `fcCacheChains[i] == NULL' failed.

2023-04-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164233 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||openttd-13.1-1.fc38

[Bug 2186953] Irrelevant fonts in the English install (KDE spin)

2023-04-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186953 --- Comment #7 from Akira TAGOH --- (In reply to ddascalescu from comment #5) > I don't know exactly how Live replicates itself to another disk, but at some > point before the file copying process starts, would it be possible to ask > the user

[Bug 2188151] New: Update packages to their latest version

2023-04-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188151 Bug ID: 2188151 Summary: Update packages to their latest version Product: Fedora Version: 37 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: sil-charis-

[Bug 1954359] Many emoji don't show up in Qt apps because qt does not handle 'emoji' font family

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1954359 Adam Williamson changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|AcceptedFreezeException |AcceptedFreezeException

[Bug 2186953] Irrelevant fonts in the English install (KDE spin)

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186953 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen --- (In reply to ddascalescu from comment #3) > Created attachment 1957781 [details] > Ridiculous font drop-down Okay I had a look too: it does seem that Libreoffice Writer has considerably more font entries

[Bug 2186953] Irrelevant fonts in the English install (KDE spin)

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186953 --- Comment #5 from ddascale...@gmail.com --- I don't know exactly how Live replicates itself to another disk, but at some point before the file copying process starts, would it be possible to ask the user about fonts? Perhaps in the language c

[Bug 2186953] Irrelevant fonts in the English install (KDE spin)

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186953 Akira TAGOH changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ta...@redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Ak

[Bug 2186711] "Open Sans" substitute config affects other languages' default font selection

2023-04-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186711 Red Hat One Jira (issues.redhat.com) changed: What|Removed |Added Link ID||Red Hat Issue Tra

[Bug 2186953] Irrelevant fonts in the English install (KDE spin)

2023-04-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186953 --- Comment #3 from ddascale...@gmail.com --- Created attachment 1957781 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1957781&action=edit Ridiculous font drop-down > but these packages are really relevant to some users Those users are

[Bug 2186711] "Open Sans" substitute config affects other languages' default font selection

2023-04-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186711 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||peter...@redhat.com Severity|

[Bug 2186953] Irrelevant fonts in the English install (KDE spin)

2023-04-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186953 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value

[Bug 2186953] Irrelevant fonts in the English install (KDE spin)

2023-04-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186953 --- Comment #1 from ddascale...@gmail.com --- Created attachment 1957564 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1957564&action=edit Chinese input methods in US English install Also, a "Chinese Pinyin input method" component was in

[Bug 2186953] New: Irrelevant fonts in the English install (KDE spin)

2023-04-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186953 Bug ID: 2186953 Summary: Irrelevant fonts in the English install (KDE spin) Product: Fedora Version: 37 Status: NEW Component: Fonts Severity: medium Assignee:

[Bug 2186711] New: "Open Sans" substitute config affects other languages' default font selection

2023-04-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186711 Bug ID: 2186711 Summary: "Open Sans" substitute config affects other languages' default font selection Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: g

[Bug 2164233] FcCacheFini: Assertion `fcCacheChains[i] == NULL' failed.

2023-04-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164233 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-fe8f70bcc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --re

[Bug 2164233] FcCacheFini: Assertion `fcCacheChains[i] == NULL' failed.

2023-04-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164233 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-21b190cdf1 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --re

[Bug 2164233] FcCacheFini: Assertion `fcCacheChains[i] == NULL' failed.

2023-04-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164233 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fed

[Bug 2164233] FcCacheFini: Assertion `fcCacheChains[i] == NULL' failed.

2023-04-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164233 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-fe8f70bcc8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-fe8f70bcc8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 2164233] FcCacheFini: Assertion `fcCacheChains[i] == NULL' failed.

2023-04-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164233 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #12 from

[Bug 2186430] New: CVE-2023-2004 freetype: integer overflowin in tt_hvadvance_adjust() in src/truetype/ttgxvar.c [fedora-all]

2023-04-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186430 Bug ID: 2186430 Summary: CVE-2023-2004 freetype: integer overflowin in tt_hvadvance_adjust() in src/truetype/ttgxvar.c [fedora-all] Product: Fedora Version: 37

[Bug 2186430] CVE-2023-2004 freetype: integer overflowin in tt_hvadvance_adjust() in src/truetype/ttgxvar.c [fedora-all]

2023-04-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186430 TEJ RATHI changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2186428 (CVE-2023-2004) Referenced Bugs

[Bug 2186430] CVE-2023-2004 freetype: integer overflowin in tt_hvadvance_adjust() in src/truetype/ttgxvar.c [fedora-all]

2023-04-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186430 --- Comment #1 from TEJ RATHI --- Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as this tracking bug. This will ensure that all associated b

[Bug 2164233] FcCacheFini: Assertion `fcCacheChains[i] == NULL' failed.

2023-04-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164233 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-21b190cdf1 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-21b190cdf1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 2185915] Failure to expand rpm macro

2023-04-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2185915 Red Hat One Jira (issues.redhat.com) changed: What|Removed |Added Link ID||Red Hat Issue Tra

[Bug 2185915] Failure to expand rpm macro

2023-04-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2185915 Panu Matilainen changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value

[Bug 2088665] Noto Sans is chosen to display symbol characters it doesn't contain

2023-04-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088665 --- Comment #10 from t...@danielflaum.net --- I just checked, and the issue is still occurring for me on my main Fedora 37 install. I will try to reproduce in a clean VM later this week. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug 2088665] Noto Sans is chosen to display symbol characters it doesn't contain

2023-04-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088665 Alejandro Ochoa changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alexvii...@gmail.com --- Comment #9

[Bug 2185459] obsolete/provide of fontawesome5-fonts does not work

2023-04-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2185459 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||fontawesome-fonts-6.4.0-2.f

[Bug 2185459] obsolete/provide of fontawesome5-fonts does not work

2023-04-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2185459 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from F

[Bug 2185459] obsolete/provide of fontawesome5-fonts does not work

2023-04-10 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2185459 Jerry James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Jerry Jame

[Bug 2185459] obsolete/provide of fontawesome5-fonts does not work

2023-04-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2185459 Red Hat One Jira (issues.redhat.com) changed: What|Removed |Added Link ID||Red Hat Issue Tra

[Bug 2185459] New: obsolete/provide of fontawesome5-fonts does not work

2023-04-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2185459 Bug ID: 2185459 Summary: obsolete/provide of fontawesome5-fonts does not work Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Component

[Bug 1857488] fontawesome-fonts-6.4.0 is available

2023-04-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1857488 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1857488] fontawesome-fonts-6.4.0 is available

2023-04-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1857488 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #32 from

[Bug 1954359] Many emoji don't show up in Qt apps because qt does not handle 'emoji' font family

2023-04-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1954359 --- Comment #10 from marcd...@fedoraproject.org --- *** Bug 2129299 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=19543

[Bug 2184872] New: User installed Japanese fonts override system fonts when substituting glyphs

2023-04-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184872 Bug ID: 2184872 Summary: User installed Japanese fonts override system fonts when substituting glyphs Product: Fedora Version: 37 Status: NEW Component: fontcon

[Bug 2184790] adobe-source-sans-pro-fonts-3.052R is available

2023-04-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184790 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Scratch build failed. Details below: BuilderException: Build failed: Command '['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs', '/var/tmp/thn-pubi0syi/adobe-source-sans-pro-fonts

[Bug 2184790] New: adobe-source-sans-pro-fonts-3.052R is available

2023-04-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184790 Bug ID: 2184790 Summary: adobe-source-sans-pro-fonts-3.052R is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: adobe-source-sans-pro-fonts Keywords: Fut

[Bug 1076190] Rendering of Unicode tie bars could be improved

2023-04-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076190 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|vishalvijayraghavan@gmail.c |peter

[Bug 1895482] Liberation Fonts Support For Serbian locl Glyphs Incomplete

2023-04-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895482 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|vishalvijayraghavan@gmail.c |peter

[Bug 1954359] Many emoji don't show up in Qt apps because qt does not handle 'emoji' font family

2023-04-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1954359 Red Hat One Jira (issues.redhat.com) changed: What|Removed |Added Link ID||Red Hat Issue Tra

[Bug 1954359] Many emoji don't show up in Qt apps because qt does not handle 'emoji' font family

2023-04-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1954359 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproj

[Bug 2119608] Fonts SIG tracker bug

2023-04-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119608 Bug 2119608 depends on bug 2181956, which changed state. Bug 2181956 Summary: Review Request: python-fontrpmspec - Font Packaging tool for Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181956 What|Removed

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||qt5-qtbase-5.15.8-10.fc38

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 --- Comment #39 from Than Ngo --- Brain, thanks for testing and feedbacks! Could you and other please grant the karma in https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-c7a23026f7 ? Thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #38 from Fed

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 --- Comment #37 from Brian Morrison --- I have tried the qt5-qtbase*5.15.8-10 and qt5-qtwayland*5.15.8-6 packages from https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-c7a23026f7 and they also work as expected. -- You are receiving this

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #36 from

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 --- Comment #35 from Brian Morrison --- OK, I have tried this using the qt5-qtbase*5.15.8-10 packages and qt5-qtwayland*5.15.8-4.1 packages. Stopping and restarting a Qt application now seems to work OK, I have menus and the controls are the

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 --- Comment #34 from Brian Morrison --- OK, I will test it once the qt5-wayland packages are available too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 --- Comment #33 from Than Ngo --- (In reply to Brian Morrison from comment #32) > So it is not going to work on GNOME Wayland? For GNOME Wayland we need to rebuild qt5-qtwayland against new qt5-qtbase. I will do this later. For quick test we

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 --- Comment #32 from Brian Morrison --- So it is not going to work on GNOME Wayland? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 ___

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 --- Comment #31 from Than Ngo --- (In reply to Brian Morrison from comment #29) > I can only see x86_64 rpms, my system has 2 .i686 rpms and I can't run the > upgrade without them. > > If someone can provide a scratch build with all arches pr

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 --- Comment #30 from Jens Petersen --- I tested https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/tagoh/qt5-qtbase/fedora-38-x86_64/05725782-qt5-qtbase/ too on X11 in Fedora-KDE-Live-x86_64-38-20230328.n.0.iso and now CJK output renders again

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 --- Comment #29 from Brian Morrison --- I can only see x86_64 rpms, my system has 2 .i686 rpms and I can't run the upgrade without them. If someone can provide a scratch build with all arches present then I will try that. -- You are receiv

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 --- Comment #28 from Than Ngo --- I downloaded and tested Akira's build, confirmed that it also works for me. Thanks Akira and Peng for the fix! @Brian and other, could you please test Akira's build and report the result before i do officical

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 Akira TAGOH changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment|0 |1 #1953864 is|

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 --- Comment #26 from Akira TAGOH --- Created attachment 1954381 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1954381&action=edit v3 I'm almost consluding that we need to implement full-support of variable fonts if we want to fix this i

[Bug 2051879] Review Request: fbf-ani-fonts - Script like Bengali Font

2023-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051879 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Assignee|panem...@gmail.com

[Bug 2182480] fonttools-4.39.3 is available

2023-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182480 Parag Nemade changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug 2182480] fonttools-4.39.3 is available

2023-03-28 Thread bugzilla
Nemade --- Assigning via bugzilla command -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182480 ___ fonts-bugs mailing list -- fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

[Bug 2182480] fonttools-4.39.3 is available

2023-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182480 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of fonttools-4.39.3-1.fc36.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=99251116 -- You are rece

[Bug 2182480] fonttools-4.39.3 is available

2023-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182480 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1954246 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1954246&action=edit Update to 4.39.3 (#2182480) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC li

[Bug 2182480] New: fonttools-4.39.3 is available

2023-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182480 Bug ID: 2182480 Summary: fonttools-4.39.3 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: fonttools Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assign

[Bug 1857488] fontawesome-fonts-6.4.0 is available

2023-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1857488 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|fontawesome-fonts-6.3.0 is |fontawesome-fonts-6.4.0 i

[Bug 1857488] fontawesome-fonts-6.4.0 is available

2023-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1857488 --- Comment #31 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Scratch build failed. Details below: BuilderException: Build failed: Command '['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs', '/var/tmp/thn-0uhw4olj/fontawesome-fonts.spec']'

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 --- Comment #25 from Akira TAGOH --- You can't replace FcFontMatch with FcFontSort. I'm not sure if there are really any such code paths though, they set FC_FILE and FC_INDEX only when QFontEngine::FaceId has a filename. This implies that fil

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 --- Comment #24 from Peng Wu --- BTW, the patch disables the freetype code about embolden value in Qt with Linux only. And in fontconfig, the similar logic of the freetype code is implemented in the /etc/fonts/conf.d/90-synthetic.conf file.

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 --- Comment #23 from Peng Wu --- As Akira Tagoh said, there are two issues in the code, so I just updated my patch. 1. The usage of FcFontMatch may be not correct, as it doesn't compare the FC_INDEX when matching. In the patch, I switch to us

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 Peng Wu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment|0 |1 #1952248 is|

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 Peng Wu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(p...@redhat.com) | --- Comment #21 from Peng Wu --- I can r

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 Akira TAGOH changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(ta...@redhat.com) | --- Comment #20 from Akira TAGOH ---

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 Than Ngo changed: What|Removed |Added Comment #18 is|1 |0 private|

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 Than Ngo changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(ta...@redhat.com) -- You are r

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 Than Ngo changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(p...@redhat.com) -- You are re

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 --- Comment #19 from Than Ngo --- (In reply to Jan Grulich from comment #17) > I unpushed the update sin(In reply to Brian Morrison from comment #14) > > I tried the qt5-qtbase and qt5-qtwayland updates in the update from comment > > 13. > >

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 Jan Grulich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |ASSIGNED --- Comment #17 from Jan Gruli

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 Geoffrey Marr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gm...@redhat.com Whiteboard|

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fed

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 Brian Morrison changed: What|Removed |Added CC||b...@fenrir.org.uk --- Comment #14 f

[Bug 2179854] Qt 5 render the Bold style CJK character very thick with Noto CJK variable fonts

2023-03-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179854 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #13 from

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >