Re: fop-0.92.beta: Thread safety issues with FOP instance construction

2006-05-15 Thread Simon Pepping
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 09:33:49AM +0200, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > I'm sure everyone has seen this thread on fop-users. Any particular > preferences on one of the two options I listed below? The first will > require coordination with Batik as they are supposed to migrate to that > class and it's ba

Re: fop-0.92.beta: Thread safety issues with FOP instance construction

2006-05-15 Thread Chris Bowditch
Jeremias Maerki wrote: I'm sure everyone has seen this thread on fop-users. Any particular preferences on one of the two options I listed below? The first will require coordination with Batik as they are supposed to migrate to that class and it's basically their version. We used a modified versi

Re: fop-0.92.beta: Thread safety issues with FOP instance construction

2006-05-15 Thread Jeremias Maerki
I'm sure everyone has seen this thread on fop-users. Any particular preferences on one of the two options I listed below? The first will require coordination with Batik as they are supposed to migrate to that class and it's basically their version. We used a modified version of theirs. The second i