; Senior Software Developer
> Object Group
> InterSystems
> +1 617-621-0600
> jonathan.levin...@intersystems.com
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jonathan Levinson
>> Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 2:39 PM
>> To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.
1-0600
jonathan.levin...@intersystems.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Pepping [mailto:spepp...@leverkruid.eu]
> Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 1:53 PM
> To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Why do you use .cmd rather than .bat?
>
> To avoid cod
.
Best Regards,
Jonathan Levinson
Senior Software Developer
Object Group
InterSystems
+1 617-621-0600
jonathan.levin...@intersystems.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Pepping [mailto:spepp...@leverkruid.eu]
> Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 1:53 PM
> To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apa
To avoid code duplication, is it possible to have fop.cmd say
something like 'call fop.bat'? Can you test that? I have no computer
with Windows available.
Or vice versa. Which is the canonical name, bat or cmd?
Simon
On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 04:17:37PM -0500, Jonathan Levinson wrote:
> A copy nam
jonathan.levin...@intersystems.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Pepping [mailto:spepp...@leverkruid.eu]
> Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2011 4:07 AM
> To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Why do you use .cmd rather than .bat?
>
> On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 06:02
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 06:02:29PM -0500, Jonathan Levinson wrote:
> Hi Glenn,
>
> I have a question for you about skynav FOP. Why on Windows do you use ".cmd"
> as the extension of the fop command file - fop.cmd, rather than fop.bat?
>
> We are going to be deploying skynav FOP at many sites an
That's a good question. That is how it is named in the FOP trunk, and has
been for a long time apparently. I agree that fop.bat would be preferable
for Win platforms. I'll suggest this be changed in trunk, in which case I
can merge into my dev repo.
I never use fop.cmd myself for my development wo
