Re: [fossil-users] new fossil docs: is the wiki or embedded docs preferred?

2011-09-16 Thread Dmitry Chestnykh
On Sep 16, 2011, at 9:39 PM, Paul Ruizendaal wrote: > Hmmm… > > If Fossil was created today, with the knowledge of today, would it still have > wiki pages? Would it make Fossil a simpler, but equally powerful tool if it > just had (web editable) embedded documentation? Embedded documentation i

Re: [fossil-users] new fossil docs: is the wiki or embedded docs preferred?

2011-09-16 Thread Stephan Beal
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Paul Ruizendaal wrote: > Hmmm… > > If Fossil was created today, with the knowledge of today, would it still > have wiki pages? Would it make Fossil a simpler, but equally powerful tool > if it just had (web editable) embedded documentation? Good question. When i

Re: [fossil-users] new fossil docs: is the wiki or embedded docs preferred?

2011-09-16 Thread Paul Ruizendaal
Hmmm… If Fossil was created today, with the knowledge of today, would it still have wiki pages? Would it make Fossil a simpler, but equally powerful tool if it just had (web editable) embedded documentation? Paul On 15 Sep 2011, at 14:10 , Matt Welland wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:50 AM

Re: [fossil-users] new fossil docs: is the wiki or embedded docs preferred?

2011-09-15 Thread Stephan Beal
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Matt Welland wrote: > >> ...checking in of controlled files from the web interface? It imagine it >> would require >> > > Just FYI: one of the goals of the JSON API is saving wiki pages (and > Sorry, hit sen

Re: [fossil-users] new fossil docs: is the wiki or embedded docs preferred?

2011-09-15 Thread Stephan Beal
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Matt Welland wrote: > In my own projects I've found this to be true also but then we sorely miss > the ability to make quick edits which is one of the best things about the > Wiki. Is it technically feasible to implement editing and checking in of > controlled fil

Re: [fossil-users] new fossil docs: is the wiki or embedded docs preferred?

2011-09-15 Thread Matt Welland
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:50 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:11 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > >> Hi, all, >> >> When adding new docs (for the up-coming json bits), which is the currently >> preferred approach: wiki or embedded docs ? >> > > I've grown to prefer embedded docs,

Re: [fossil-users] new fossil docs: is the wiki or embedded docs preferred?

2011-09-15 Thread Richard Hipp
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:11 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > Hi, all, > > When adding new docs (for the up-coming json bits), which is the currently > preferred approach: wiki or embedded docs ? > I've grown to prefer embedded docs, since they are tied to specific versions of the code, and hence you k

[fossil-users] new fossil docs: is the wiki or embedded docs preferred?

2011-09-15 Thread Stephan Beal
Hi, all, When adding new docs (for the up-coming json bits), which is the currently preferred approach: wiki or embedded docs ? -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.or