Re: [fossil-users] git vs fossil again (was: why you should not shun)

2011-10-06 Thread altufaltu
: [fossil-users] git vs fossil again (was: why you should not > shun) > > I get the two points of view and I'm not saying one is right or wrong. > Modifying the history versus keeping everything as indeed happens (the > history after all) > > Yesterday I was confu

Re: [fossil-users] git vs fossil again (was: why you should not shun)

2011-10-05 Thread Erlis Vidal
I get the two points of view and I'm not saying one is right or wrong. Modifying the history versus keeping everything as indeed happens (the history after all) Yesterday I was confused because I though the shun was done in the big file, but indeed the shun was done in the commit also... will that

Re: [fossil-users] git vs fossil again (was: why you should not shun)

2011-10-05 Thread Mike Meyer
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote: > On 5 October 2011 20:12, Mike Meyer wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Konstantin Khomoutov > > wrote: > >> > >> That sort of "we don't need it, we don't need it" mantra is a typical > >> case of the famous "Blub paradox". > >> I

Re: [fossil-users] git vs fossil again (was: why you should not shun)

2011-10-05 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 11:12:31 -0700 Mike Meyer wrote: > > That sort of "we don't need it, we don't need it" mantra is a > > typical case of the famous "Blub paradox". > > I mean, if we have two DVCS tools one of which makes you able to > > rewrite history and another one which doesn't, the first on

Re: [fossil-users] git vs fossil again (was: why you should not shun)

2011-10-05 Thread Michal Suchanek
On 5 October 2011 20:12, Mike Meyer wrote: > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Konstantin Khomoutov > wrote: >> >> That sort of "we don't need it, we don't need it" mantra is a typical >> case of the famous "Blub paradox". >> I mean, if we have two DVCS tools one of which makes you able to >> rewr

Re: [fossil-users] git vs fossil again (was: why you should not shun)

2011-10-05 Thread Mike Meyer
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Konstantin Khomoutov < flatw...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > That sort of "we don't need it, we don't need it" mantra is a typical > case of the famous "Blub paradox". > I mean, if we have two DVCS tools one of which makes you able to > rewrite history and anoth

Re: [fossil-users] git vs fossil again (was: why you should not shun)

2011-10-05 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 18:24:30 +0200 Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: [...] > > And when you find an issue with a commit that is some way back in > > your personal branch it is more logical and easier to review your > > branch if you append the fix to the commit where it belongs > > logically or if you

[fossil-users] git vs fossil again (was: why you should not shun)

2011-10-05 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 06:06:07PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: > 2011/10/5 Lluís Batlle i Rossell : > > git looks to me as a tool for publishing development steps, not necessarily > > very > > related to the development history. The 'git version graph' is determined > > by the > > users the sam