: [fossil-users] git vs fossil again (was: why you should not
> shun)
>
> I get the two points of view and I'm not saying one is right or wrong.
> Modifying the history versus keeping everything as indeed happens (the
> history after all)
>
> Yesterday I was confu
I get the two points of view and I'm not saying one is right or wrong.
Modifying the history versus keeping everything as indeed happens (the
history after all)
Yesterday I was confused because I though the shun was done in the big file,
but indeed the shun was done in the commit also... will that
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> On 5 October 2011 20:12, Mike Meyer wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Konstantin Khomoutov
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> That sort of "we don't need it, we don't need it" mantra is a typical
> >> case of the famous "Blub paradox".
> >> I
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 11:12:31 -0700
Mike Meyer wrote:
> > That sort of "we don't need it, we don't need it" mantra is a
> > typical case of the famous "Blub paradox".
> > I mean, if we have two DVCS tools one of which makes you able to
> > rewrite history and another one which doesn't, the first on
On 5 October 2011 20:12, Mike Meyer wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Konstantin Khomoutov
> wrote:
>>
>> That sort of "we don't need it, we don't need it" mantra is a typical
>> case of the famous "Blub paradox".
>> I mean, if we have two DVCS tools one of which makes you able to
>> rewr
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Konstantin Khomoutov <
flatw...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> That sort of "we don't need it, we don't need it" mantra is a typical
> case of the famous "Blub paradox".
> I mean, if we have two DVCS tools one of which makes you able to
> rewrite history and anoth
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 18:24:30 +0200
Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote:
[...]
> > And when you find an issue with a commit that is some way back in
> > your personal branch it is more logical and easier to review your
> > branch if you append the fix to the commit where it belongs
> > logically or if you
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 06:06:07PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> 2011/10/5 Lluís Batlle i Rossell :
> > git looks to me as a tool for publishing development steps, not necessarily
> > very
> > related to the development history. The 'git version graph' is determined
> > by the
> > users the sam
8 matches
Mail list logo