On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Gregory Kohs wrote:
> Will the final report include a note about how "unwelcome" User:NawlinWiki
> made the study participants feel when he indefinitely blocked their
> accounts
> for "abusing" Wikipedia?
We, the usability team, with lots of help from stewards
>
>
> I know a new GUI is being worked on. For the moment I hacked the
> following JavaScript suggestion:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Magnus_Manske/newbiehelp.js
>
> This adds a "how?" link into the "edit" tab, and launches a floating
> panel with some extremely general content:
>
> http:
Steven,
You're welcome. There's also this, which I still long to turn into a
proper report with excerpts and screenshots :
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WQ/Retro
You are right that wikipedia has a website-product as one of its major
outputs. And the focus on this important large-scale product
SJ, thanks for sharing the nostalgia.wikipedia.org link. I've been a
Wikimedian for four years, and not once stumbled across that. You learn
something new every day...
As for the "educational products" phrase, my feeling is yes, the community
on-wiki doesn't tend to think of the projects *literall
Will the final report include a note about how "unwelcome" User:NawlinWiki
made the study participants feel when he indefinitely blocked their accounts
for "abusing" Wikipedia?
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=User%3AUsability_Tester_3
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 5:39 AM, Andre Engels wrote:
> > 1. Be accurate and comprehensive in the representation of subjects.
>
> Since for many pictures the subject is what happens to be represented
> on the photograph, this is mostly vacuous. As an example, a journalist
> going to a protest ma
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 2:08 AM, Parul Vora wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> The Wikipedia Usability Initiative conducted a user research study with
> SF based Bolt Peters in late March to uncover barriers new editors face.
> We are in the process of completing a full report on our methodology,
> process and
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Anthony wrote:
> Here's the NPPA Code of ethics:
>
> 1. Be accurate and comprehensive in the representation of subjects.
> 2. Resist being manipulated by staged photo opportunities.
> 3. Be complete and provide context when photographing or recording
> sub
Welcome, Jennifer. The current foundation-l traffic isn't quite as
vibrant an intro to the community today as it was in 2005 or so. I
hope you will share your thoughts, even unformed!
For a historical taste, don't forget to visit the nostalgia wiki:
http://nostalgia.wikipedia.org
...and even ht
Good work Ziko, thank you very much.
Ting
Ziko van Dijk wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Just a few minutes ago I have sent the second edition of my "Infobrief
> Wiki-Welt". It is meant for people who are interested in Wikipedia and
> related subjects, but are no Wikipedians, for example journalists,
> teache
10 matches
Mail list logo
