Hi,
Olav Vitters wrote:
> 1. Conflicts with the schedule for GNOME 3.2 (feature, API, docs are @
> Aug 15, UI one week later). Basically the proposed freezes are right
> after the desktop summit. There is not much that we can do regarding
> scheduling GNOME as GUADEC has consistently been later an
Hi!
> 1. Conflicts with the schedule for GNOME 3.2 (feature, API, docs are @
> Aug 15, UI one week later). Basically the proposed freezes are right
> after the desktop summit. There is not much that we can do regarding
> scheduling GNOME as GUADEC has consistently been later and later in the
> yea
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 09:30:49AM +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
> Hi Gil,
>
> Gil Forcada wrote:
> > So criticism was expected? I understood as a set-in-stone decision :)
>
> Feedback was expected... some of this *is* set in stone, but I
> definitely prefer hearing concerns now, so that we can try to
Hi,
Johannes Schmid wrote:
> I know that we discussed in the first meeting to have a pre-registration
> the day before and don't start the first day before 12 to allow smooth
> registration. Don't know if they changed everything back in the second
> meeting...
I don't think it makes sense to star
Hi Gil,
Gil Forcada wrote:
> So criticism was expected? I understood as a set-in-stone decision :)
Feedback was expected... some of this *is* set in stone, but I
definitely prefer hearing concerns now, so that we can try to address them.
> Just from an organizational PoV: having the core days in
Hi!
> Makes sense to me. And if anyone knows what will and won't make
> conferences like GUADEC run smoothly, it's _probably_ Gil.
I know that we discussed in the first meeting to have a pre-registration
the day before and don't start the first day before 12 to allow smooth
registration. Don't kn
On Oct 11, 2010, at 4:11 PM, Gil Forcada wrote:
>
> So in short, one day as registration/pre-conference/hackfest/BoF day it
> should be a must for all conferences that everyone expects to run
> smoothly.
Makes sense to me. And if anyone knows what will and won't make conferences
like GUADEC run
El dl 11 de 10 de 2010 a les 09:56 +0200, en/na Dave Neary va escriure:
> Hi,
>
> Dave Neary wrote:
>
> > Three things are worth singing out to GUADEC attendees as significant
> > differences from previous events.
> >
> > First, the conference will be held later than usual, on 6-12 August.
>
>
Hi,
Dave Neary wrote:
> Three things are worth singing out to GUADEC attendees as significant
> differences from previous events.
>
> First, the conference will be held later than usual, on 6-12 August.
> Second is the conference format.
> Third, following a lot of feedback after Gran Cana
Hi all,
As some of you may have noticed, the Desktop Summit dates, format and
location were announced today [1] - and we have an updated website
online [2].
Three things are worth singing out to GUADEC attendees as significant
differences from previous events.
First, the conference will be held
10 matches
Mail list logo
