On 05 Jun 2009, at 18:44, Daniël Mantione wrote:
The WPO features Jonas is working on are very promising, and I think
he is doing something unique, I know no competing compiler that does
it.
I know that method devirtualisation is done at least in JVMs from IBM
(and probably also in Sun'
On 05 Jun 2009, at 18:58, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
I think you guys are doing a great job. From 93MB with debugging
info down to 9mb is quite a big step. Especially since 2mb are icons
and images.
I don't think that it's useful to include debugging information in any
comparisons. Especially
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 18:44:37 +0200 (CEST)
Daniël Mantione wrote:
>
>
> Op Fri, 5 Jun 2009, schreef Paul Ishenin:
>
> > How difficult is to teach compiler to remove them during
> > compilation?
>
> I sense a hope that somehow the compiler developments will ultimately
> be able to turn large Laz
Daniël Mantione wrote:
How difficult is to teach compiler to remove them during compilation?
I sense a hope that somehow the compiler developments will ultimately
be able to turn large Lazarus executables into small ones. It is not
realistic.
No, I expect just another 60Kb size decrease for
Op Fri, 5 Jun 2009, schreef Paul Ishenin:
How difficult is to teach compiler to remove them during compilation?
I sense a hope that somehow the compiler developments will ultimately be
able to turn large Lazarus executables into small ones. It is not
realistic.
The WPO features Jonas is
On 05 Jun 2009, at 17:47, Paul Ishenin wrote:
Jonas Maebe wrote:
All programs are stripped. As you can see, wpo can now remove about
61kb (before, wpo gained 8kb). Still not very much. The reason that
you need several iterations to get all possible savings, is that
the compiler only recor
Jonas Maebe wrote:
All programs are stripped. As you can see, wpo can now remove about
61kb (before, wpo gained 8kb). Still not very much. The reason that
you need several iterations to get all possible savings, is that the
compiler only records calls to virtual methods from code that is
inclu
On 31 May 2009, at 11:35, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 31 May 2009, at 10:38, Paul Ishenin wrote:
Jonas Maebe wrote:
Yes, we made a refactoring and as result empty form + button
application weights 200Kb less now. Can you check, maybe now WPO
results can be more impressive?
Still quite minimal
What do you think about?
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
