Op Fri, 19 May 2006, schreef Flávio Etrusco:
> > Free Pascal is Delphi compatible.
>
> I know that FPC aims to be Delphi-compatible, but it's not always the
> case, as e.g. the WideStrings were reference-counted until a couple of
> months ago.
> So you are saying that in this is specific case F
On 5/19/06, Daniël Mantione <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Op Thu, 18 May 2006, schreef Flávio Etrusco:
> > L> Dynamic arrays can be very handy and I never knew anyone who avoids
> > L> them. Of course if your array has fixed length there's no reason
> > L> to use a dynamic array either.
> > L> Fo
Op Thu, 18 May 2006, schreef Flávio Etrusco:
> > L> Dynamic arrays can be very handy and I never knew anyone who avoids
> > L> them. Of course if your array has fixed length there's no reason
> > L> to use a dynamic array either.
> > L> Fortunately it's no very often that one falls in Borland's
On 5/18/06, Пётр Косаревский с mail.ru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
L> Can someone tell me how slow/fast a dynamic array is compared to a fixed
one? Say you used
L> a dynamic array of chars or dynamic array of shortstrings - would the
dynamic array be
L> slow on a general basis? Maybe we will hav
But it's only a matter of time:
probably Windows will become totally utf16 (not really unicode, but
at least utf16) really soon (at least in newer versions in a way
incompatible with current ones).
A small correction, utf16 is a type of unicode.
thanks,
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
__
L> Can someone tell me how slow/fast a dynamic array is compared to a fixed
one? Say you used
L> a dynamic array of chars or dynamic array of shortstrings - would the
dynamic array be
L> slow on a general basis? Maybe we will have to resort to benchmarks using
the cpu timer.
L> And then there is
