Which is worse? --
- You reply to a message on the list. Assuming that you are replying to
the sender, you include information that is personal, privileged, or
inappropriate-for-public-consumption. Your reply goes to the entire
list. The damage is done.
- You reply to a message on the list. It
On Wed, 14 May 2008 22:05:47 -0400, Alan Houser
wrote:
>Which is worse? --
>
>- You reply to a message on the list. Assuming that you are replying to
>the sender, you include information that is personal, privileged, or
>inappropriate-for-public-consumption. Your reply goes to the entire
>lis
On 15 May 2008, at 04:25, Jeremy H. Griffith wrote:
> On Wed, 14 May 2008 22:05:47 -0400, Alan Houser
>
> wrote:
>
>> Which is worse? --
>>
>> - You reply to a message on the list. Assuming that you are
>> replying to
>> the sender, you include information that is personal, privileged, or
>>
Paul Findon wrote (in part):
> Hedley is not asking for a "reply-to-all." What he, I and, no doubt,
> others want is "reply-to-list." In other words, when you click your
> Reply button, by default, messages are addressed to the list.
>
> I've been using lists since 1993 and running several sin
Interesting. I'm on 22 different email lists, and this is the only one
with that particular behavior that I'm aware of. As I mostly lurk, the
issue has never come up for me before.
Gail
Fred Ridder wrote:
> Paul Findon wrote (in part):
>
>
>> Hedley is not asking for a "reply-to-all." What
I believe this is the default Mailman set up, usually used to reduce
the risk of the email loops that Jeremy already mentioned.
Art
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Fred Ridder wrote:
>
> Paul Findon wrote (in part):
>
>> Hedley is not asking for a "reply-to-all." What he, I and, no doubt,
>> o
> Hedley is not asking for a "reply-to-all." What he, I and, no doubt,
> others want is "reply-to-list." In other words, when you click your
> Reply button, by default, messages are addressed to the list.
>
> I've been using lists since 1993 and running several since 1996, and
> Framers is the on
At least one major email list that I subscribe to uses LISTSERV email
list management software. In this scheme, one posts messages to a
LISTSERV-powered server which in turn redistributes the posting to
all of the subscribers, either as individual email messages or in
digest format, comprising
Which is worse? --
- You reply to a message on the list. Assuming that you are replying to
the sender, you include information that is personal, privileged, or
inappropriate-for-public-consumption. Your reply goes to the entire
list. The damage is done.
- You reply to a message on the list. It
On Wed, 14 May 2008 22:05:47 -0400, Alan Houser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Which is worse? --
>
>- You reply to a message on the list. Assuming that you are replying to
>the sender, you include information that is personal, privileged, or
>inappropriate-for-public-consumption. Your reply goes
On 15 May 2008, at 04:25, Jeremy H. Griffith wrote:
> On Wed, 14 May 2008 22:05:47 -0400, Alan Houser
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> Which is worse? --
>>
>> - You reply to a message on the list. Assuming that you are
>> replying to
>> the sender, you include information that is personal,
Paul Findon wrote (in part):
> Hedley is not asking for a "reply-to-all." What he, I and, no doubt,
> others want is "reply-to-list." In other words, when you click your
> Reply button, by default, messages are addressed to the list.
>
> I've been using lists since 1993 and running several si
Interesting. I'm on 22 different email lists, and this is the only one
with that particular behavior that I'm aware of. As I mostly lurk, the
issue has never come up for me before.
Gail
Fred Ridder wrote:
> Paul Findon wrote (in part):
>
>
>> Hedley is not asking for a "reply-to-all." What
I believe this is the default Mailman set up, usually used to reduce
the risk of the email loops that Jeremy already mentioned.
Art
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Fred Ridder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Paul Findon wrote (in part):
>
>> Hedley is not asking for a "reply-to-all." What he, I
> Hedley is not asking for a "reply-to-all." What he, I and, no doubt,
> others want is "reply-to-list." In other words, when you click your
> Reply button, by default, messages are addressed to the list.
>
> I've been using lists since 1993 and running several since 1996, and
> Framers is the o
At least one major email list that I subscribe to uses LISTSERV email
list management software. In this scheme, one posts messages to a
LISTSERV-powered server which in turn redistributes the posting to
all of the subscribers, either as individual email messages or in
digest format, comprising
16 matches
Mail list logo
