The cluster is being relocated!
adrian
On 14 October 2012 12:50, Oliver Pinter wrote:
> Hi All!
>
> I got this message, when I why try to pull from git.freebsd.org:
>
> ---8<---
> fatal: unable to connect git.freebsd.org:
> git.freebsd.org[0: 69.147.83.33]: errno=Connection refused
> git.free
On 8/30/2012 10:56 AM, John Nielsen wrote:
> Running ps in another terminal shows "pkg query %n-%v". Since the actual pkg
> is now gone, I suspect this is really /usr/sbin/pkg. I further suspect that
> it's waiting for y/n input (whether to install the binary pkg) on its
> nonexistent stdin some
Hi All!
I got this message, when I why try to pull from git.freebsd.org:
---8<---
fatal: unable to connect git.freebsd.org:
git.freebsd.org[0: 69.147.83.33]: errno=Connection refused
git.freebsd.org[1: 2001:4f8:fff6::21]: errno=No route to host
---8<---
The IPv6 related are ok, while this machin
On 10/08/12 04:04, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
David and Michael,
On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 10:52:13AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
G> > On 10/07/12 13:03, Garrett Cooper wrote:
G> >> Maybe these revisions had something to do with it... (r241245 is
G> >> more likely)?
G> >
G> > I reverted r241245
> I do not loathe ULE, but I also do not use ULE.
Maybe my wording wasn't exactly suitable, but that was the
point I was trying to make. ULE is default for quite some
time (and boasted impressive benchmarks upon introduction too),
yet in reality 4BSD is far from being superseded for many.
--
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 01:09:47AM -0700, Jakub Lach wrote:
>
> "* Scheduler rewrite"
>
> They threw out old scheduler and have instant gains? That's
> too good to be true, seeing as still some loathe ULE in
> FreeBSD after all this time.
>
'loathe' appears to be an interesting choice of word.
On 14.10.2012 12:47, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 14/10/2012 00:27 Pedro Giffuni said the following:
Actually ...
On 10/13/2012 13:38, Jakub Lach wrote:
I'm not at all up to date with DragonFly, so does anybody know
what did they change so spectacularly between 3.0/3.2?
Their explanation of the ch
on 14/10/2012 00:27 Pedro Giffuni said the following:
> Actually ...
>
> On 10/13/2012 13:38, Jakub Lach wrote:
>> I'm not at all up to date with DragonFly, so does anybody know
>> what did they change so spectacularly between 3.0/3.2?
>>
> Their explanation of the changes is here:
>
> http://www
Thanks for replies.
"* Finally, default values for many things on 64-bit machines
have been adjusted upward significantly to make proper use
of available resources"
Well that one should be fast to test, if it really makes so much
difference.
"* Scheduler rewrite"
They threw out old scheduler
