Re: Can't build -CURRENT on 4.7

2003-06-09 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 11:57:00PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 09:46:07PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: The compiler in 4.7 does not like this: -std=gnu99 As a result, buildworld of -CURRENT fails rather early. Committers are not required to support

Re: Can't build -CURRENT on 4.7

2003-06-08 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 03:34:08PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: > David O'Brien wrote: > > >This won't work on non-i386, due to alloca issues. > >>+ WORLDTMP=${WORLDTMP} CSTD= \ > >may. > > > Hmmm... This seems like the Right Thing in > any case, since it is one less assumption you're

Re: Can't build -CURRENT on 4.7

2003-06-07 Thread Tim Kientzle
David O'Brien wrote: This won't work on non-i386, due to alloca issues. + WORLDTMP=${WORLDTMP} CSTD= \ may. Hmmm... This seems like the Right Thing in any case, since it is one less assumption you're making about the build environment. I'm still getting buildworld failures, though. Long afte

Re: Can't build -CURRENT on 4.7

2003-06-07 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > + WORLDTMP=${WORLDTMP} CSTD= \ : : may. This seems to mostly work... I'm trying to sort out a couple of other issues, but those may be related to other changes that I've made in my test tree. W

Re: Can't build -CURRENT on 4.7

2003-06-07 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 10:38:15AM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: > Index: Makefile.inc1 > === > RCS file: /usr/src/cvs/src/Makefile.inc1,v > retrieving revision 1.363 > diff -u -r1.363 Makefile.inc1 > --- Makefile.inc1 31 May 2003 21:

Re: Can't build -CURRENT on 4.7

2003-06-07 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 10:38:15AM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: > Index: usr.bin/xlint/lint1/cgram.y > === > RCS file: /usr/src/cvs/src/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/cgram.y,v > retrieving revision 1.7 > diff -u -r1.7 cgram.y > --- usr.bin/xlint/l

Re: Can't build -CURRENT on 4.7

2003-06-07 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > First off, I'd like to say that's my understanding as well. : : That was not my understanding at all. The last time it came it, it was specifically stated that it was until the branch point. But so far th

Re: Can't build -CURRENT on 4.7

2003-06-07 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 06:30:11AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 11:57:00PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > : > On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 09:46:07PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: > : > > T

Re: Can't build -CURRENT on 4.7

2003-06-07 Thread Tim Kientzle
David O'Brien wrote: On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 09:46:07PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: The compiler in 4.7 does not like this: -std=gnu99 As a result, buildworld of -CURRENT fails rather early. Committers are not required to support building 5-CURRENT, post 5.0-RELEASE on a 4.7 machine. So this is

Re: Can't build -CURRENT on 4.7

2003-06-07 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 11:57:00PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: : > On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 09:46:07PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: : > > The compiler in 4.7 does not like this: : > > : > > -std=gnu99 : > >

Re: Can't build -CURRENT on 4.7

2003-06-07 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 11:57:00PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 09:46:07PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: > > The compiler in 4.7 does not like this: > > > > -std=gnu99 > > > > As a result, buildworld of -CURRENT fails > > rather early. > > Committers are not required to

Re: Can't build -CURRENT on 4.7

2003-06-07 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 01:07:24AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > I carefully worded the reply to specifically address build 5-CURRENT on > 4.7. Can you try src/share/mk/bsd.sys.mk rev 1.29 to see if it fixes > your problem? Have you tested it thoroughly? Didn't you back out -std=c99 in a previo

Re: Can't build -CURRENT on 4.7

2003-06-07 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 12:08:31AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 11:57:00PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 09:46:07PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: > > > The compiler in 4.7 does not like this: > > > > > > -std=gnu99 > > > > > > As a result, build

Re: Can't build -CURRENT on 4.7

2003-06-07 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 11:57:00PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 09:46:07PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: > > The compiler in 4.7 does not like this: > > > > -std=gnu99 > > > > As a result, buildworld of -CURRENT fails > > rather early. > > Committers are not required to

Re: Can't build -CURRENT on 4.7

2003-06-06 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 09:46:07PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: > The compiler in 4.7 does not like this: > > -std=gnu99 > > As a result, buildworld of -CURRENT fails > rather early. Committers are not required to support building 5-CURRENT, post 5.0-RELEASE on a 4.7 machine. So this is not g

Re: Can't build -CURRENT on 4.7

2003-06-06 Thread Tim Kientzle
The compiler in 4.7 does not like this: -std=gnu99 As a result, buildworld of -CURRENT fails rather early. Tim Kientzle ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[