Experiences with new dir allocation on FFS?

2001-04-27 Thread Cejka Rudolf
Right now, I have upgraded my -current machine from February 13 to April 26. I were pleased with change to dir allocation in FFS, but here are my unpleasant test results (UDMA33, partition is 3 GB where 1 GB is free, soft-updates are enabled): Old system New system

Re: Experiences with new dir allocation on FFS?

2001-04-27 Thread Bruce Evans
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Cejka Rudolf wrote: > Right now, I have upgraded my -current machine from > February 13 to April 26. > > I were pleased with change to dir allocation in FFS, > but here are my unpleasant test results (UDMA33, partition > is 3 GB where 1 GB is free, soft-updates are enabled)

Re: Experiences with new dir allocation on FFS?

2001-04-28 Thread Salvo Bartolotta
[ resending, with a subject ] > OK, I;ve looked and looked and can't seem to figure out how to set hw.ata.wc to enabled. I've put and a few other things in /etc/sysctl.conf, the others get set, hw.ata.wc doesn't. You can't change it by hand either as sysctl tells you it's readonly. Grepping in /s

Re: Experiences with new dir allocation on FFS?

2001-04-28 Thread Peter Wemm
Erick Kinnee wrote: > On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 09:24:40AM -0500, Erick Kinnee wrote: > > No flames please, I feel I have tried to find the answer. :) > > Ok, I do deserve a flame it seems. I totally missed man ata. The > loader.conf manpage does state that there are 4 sysctl knobs tuneable > from

Re: Experiences with new dir allocation on FFS?

2001-04-28 Thread Rik van Riel
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Cejka Rudolf wrote: > > > Right now, I have upgraded my -current machine from > > February 13 to April 26. > > > > I were pleased with change to dir allocation in FFS, > > but here are my unpleasant test results (UDMA33, partition >

Re: Experiences with new dir allocation on FFS?

2001-04-30 Thread Cejka Rudolf
Bruce Evans wrote (2001/04/28): > This is probably caused by write caching now being off by default > in the ata driver, possibly amplified by not using soft updates. > Without the new dir allocation, -current would be even slower :(. Yes, thanks. I really forgot on this change. My rough results

Re: Experiences with new dir allocation on FFS?

2001-05-01 Thread Andrew Reilly
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 12:50:08AM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote: > For the people wanting to turn on write caching ... it WILL break > the write ordering needed by softupdates and journaling filesystems, > so don't do it unless you know what you're doing. > > I guess it would be better to do this ki

Re: Experiences with new dir allocation on FFS?

2001-05-09 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Salvo Bartolotta wrote: > > [ resending, with a subject ] > > > OK, I;ve looked and looked and can't seem to figure out how to set > hw.ata.wc to enabled. I've put and a few other things in > /etc/sysctl.conf, the others get set, hw.ata.wc doesn't. You can't > change it by hand either as sysctl