Re: emacs* broken in -current (was Re: Vtable thunks with egcs)

1999-04-09 Thread Steve Price
On 9 Apr 1999, Joel Ray Holveck wrote: # > I've found where this problem is coming from. It's in # > emacs20.3/src/s/freebsd.h. It sets a macro called BSD_SYSTEM based upon the # > version number contained in __FreeBSD__, checking for 1, 2 and 3. Of # > course, -current uses 4. I have found th

Re: emacs* broken in -current (was Re: Vtable thunks with egcs)

1999-04-09 Thread Joel Ray Holveck
> I've found where this problem is coming from. It's in > emacs20.3/src/s/freebsd.h. It sets a macro called BSD_SYSTEM based upon the > version number contained in __FreeBSD__, checking for 1, 2 and 3. Of > course, -current uses 4. I have found that you can check for __FreeBSD__ >= > 3, and it

RE: emacs* broken in -current (was Re: Vtable thunks with egcs)

1999-04-09 Thread Deatherage, David
9:18 PM To: Steve Price Cc: Peter Jeremy; curr...@freebsd.org; po...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: emacs* broken in -current (was Re: Vtable thunks with egcs) > You are absolutely right. I just tried the new version of emacs > that I built on my pre-egcs box and it doesn't work on that b

Re: emacs* broken in -current (was Re: Vtable thunks with egcs)

1999-04-08 Thread Joel Ray Holveck
> You are absolutely right. I just tried the new version of emacs > that I built on my pre-egcs box and it doesn't work on that box > either. This definitely doesn't appear to be anything caused by > changing to egcs. Not that it matters much but for grins I just > built/installed the xemacs por