Hi,
Garrett Wollman wrote on 11 May 1999:
[Netgear GigE PCI interface]
> I'm buying one of these cards today ($319.99 from NECX) and will stick
> it into a machine here on our new Gigabit backbone. I'm particularly
> interested to test out the VLAN support, since my Secret Plan is to
> have thi
On Sat, May 15, 1999 at 10:22:00AM -0700, Studded wrote:
>
> How about:
>
> tcp_extensions="NO" # Set to Yes to turn on RFC1323 extensions
>
> That would match existing style and be a lot more clear. I can submit a PR
> if anyone thinks that's really necessary...
I think that this is a
Josef Karthauser wrote:
> Couldn't it read:
> tcp_extensions="NO" # Switch RFC1323 extensions on?
How about:
tcp_extensions="NO" # Set to Yes to turn on RFC1323 extensions
That would match existing style and be a lot more clear. I can submit a PR
if anyone thinks that's really n
I bought two of the cards in order to decide whether or not I wanted
to use them in my research group's PII cluster. Right now, they're
plugged into a 233MHz Pentium Pro and a 400Mhz K6-2 (using an
Aladdin V-based board). I did a bunch of NFS testing over the
gigabit link last week and didn't see
On Tue, May 11, 1999 at 08:23:15PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> Isn't it more appropriate to ask where he didn't learn to read ? :-)
>
Ok. ok. thanks for the abuse :)
> >
> >> > tcp_extensions="NO" # Disallow RFC1323 extensions (or YES).
> >
So we're agreed that this is co
Isn't it more appropriate to ask where he didn't learn to read ? :-)
Poul-Henning
In message , Chuc
k Youse writes:
>
>Where did you learn to read?
>
>Chuck Youse
>Director of Systems
>cyo...@cybersites.com
>
>
>On Tue, 11 May 1999, Josef Karthauser wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 01:11:43
Where did you learn to read?
Chuck Youse
Director of Systems
cyo...@cybersites.com
On Tue, 11 May 1999, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 01:11:43AM +0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
> > tcp_extensions="NO" # Disallow RFC1323 extensions (or YES).
>
> No.. it's _on_ by def
On Wed, May 12, 1999 at 01:11:43AM +0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
> Snob Art Genre wrote:
> > On Tue, 11 May 1999, Dennis Glatting wrote:
> >
> > > In reading your message I felt compelled to ask you a question. Are
> > > you using gb end-to-end? That probably isn't a good idea because in
> > > TCP the
> IMO that's a good thing, because for some reason, the RFC 1323
> extensions break a lot of older terminal servers.
One could argue that it's more accurate to state that the terminal
servers
break RFC1323, but alas the effect is the same.
DS
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo
On Wed, 12 May 1999, Peter Wemm wrote:
> > Isn't that adequately covered by the PAWS extension from RFC 1323?
>
> Well, maybe it would, but
>
> [1:09am]~src/etc-111# grep tcp_ext defaults/rc.conf
> tcp_extensions="NO" # Disallow RFC1323 extensions (or YES).
>
> It's off by defa
< As for me, I have tested the driver with Netgear cards. Works great here,
> I got 470 Mbps (effective application to application) with ttcp, running
> back to back on a PII-350 and a Celeron 300A (overclocked to 337, thus PCI
> bus clocked at 37.5 Mhz). The limit in my case is clearly the CPU. Ho
Snob Art Genre wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 1999, Dennis Glatting wrote:
>
> > In reading your message I felt compelled to ask you a question. Are
> > you using gb end-to-end? That probably isn't a good idea because in
> > TCP the sequence numbers can wrap within timeout periods and the data
> > stream
> You didn't read what I said. I don't have a gigabit ethernet switch.
> I only have cards. Therefore the *only* way I can test the operation
> of the driver and adapters is to connect two machines with gigabit
> cards back to back with a patch cable. This automatically implies 'using
> gb end-to-
On Tue, 11 May 1999, Dennis Glatting wrote:
> In reading your message I felt compelled to ask you a question. Are
> you using gb end-to-end? That probably isn't a good idea because in
> TCP the sequence numbers can wrap within timeout periods and the data
> stream become undetectably (from a TCP p
There should be a more general mechanism for this. I have the same
problem with the USB stuff. 100+ people on the usb-bsd mailing list and
only answers to directed questions.
What about, like 'HEADS-UP', a 'FEEDBACK: ' message that
should invite people to send 'it works' messages. And maybe prov
Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Dennis Glatting
had to walk into mine and say:
> In reading your message I felt compelled to ask you a question. Are
> you using gb end-to-end? That probably isn't a good idea because in
> TCP the sequence numbers can wrap within timeout p
In reading your message I felt compelled to ask you a question. Are
you using gb end-to-end? That probably isn't a good idea because in
TCP the sequence numbers can wrap within timeout periods and the data
stream become undetectably (from a TCP perspective) corrupt.
--
Dennis Glatting
Copyright (
17 matches
Mail list logo
