On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Thomas Moestl wrote:
> On Mon, 2003/07/28 at 09:30:08 +0900, Jun Kuriyama wrote:
> >
> > Is this caused by -oS option?
> >
> > - in making BOOTMFS in make release
> > cc -c -Os -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes
> > -Wmissing-prototypes -W
Apparently, On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 03:59:00AM +0200,
Thomas Moestl said words to the effect of;
> On Mon, 2003/07/28 at 09:30:08 +0900, Jun Kuriyama wrote:
> >
> > Is this caused by -oS option?
> >
> > - in making BOOTMFS in make release
> > cc -c -Os -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -
Hmm, it seems this macro is John's baby. John?
At Mon, 28 Jul 2003 02:00:50 + (UTC),
Thomas Moestl wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> On Mon, 2003/07/28 at 09:30:08 +0900, Jun Kuriyama wrote:
> >
> > Is this caused by -oS option?
> >
> > - in making BOOTMFS in make release
> > cc -c -Os -pipe -Wall -
On Mon, 2003/07/28 at 03:59:00 +0200, Thomas Moestl wrote:
> Yes, by implying -fstrict-aliasing, so using -fno-strict-aliasing is a
> workaround. The problem is caused by the i386 PCPU_GET/PCPU_SET
> implementation:
>
> #define __PCPU_GET(name) ({
On Mon, 2003/07/28 at 09:30:08 +0900, Jun Kuriyama wrote:
>
> Is this caused by -oS option?
>
> - in making BOOTMFS in make release
> cc -c -Os -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes
> -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 10:35:22AM +0900, Jun Kuriyama wrote:
> At Mon, 28 Jul 2003 00:30:35 + (UTC),
> kuriyama wrote:
> > Is this caused by -oS option?
>
> Grrr, of course this should be s/-oS/-Os/.
>
> These warnings are caused from DROP_GIANT() macro. By tracking this
> down, actual sour
At Mon, 28 Jul 2003 00:30:35 + (UTC),
kuriyama wrote:
> Is this caused by -oS option?
Grrr, of course this should be s/-oS/-Os/.
These warnings are caused from DROP_GIANT() macro. By tracking this
down, actual source is __PCPU_GET() macro (line: 115) in
sys/i386/include/pcpu.h.
