Re: is 5.1 now more stable than 4.9rc

2003-09-30 Thread Kevin Oberman
> From: Eriq Lamar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 11:52:05 -0400 > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > It just seems that there are alot of issues w/ 4.9, doesn't seem stable at > all. Yes, but there are a lot of issues in 5.1, too. And some are the same ones. The ATAng issues are hittin

Re: is 5.1 now more stable than 4.9rc

2003-09-30 Thread Steve Kargl
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:52:05AM -0400, Eriq Lamar wrote: > It just seems that there are alot of issues w/ 4.9, doesn't seem stable at > all. > The answer is probably "no". Of course, your vague statement about 4.9 not being stable makes it hard to judge whether 5.1 is a better choice than 4.

is 5.1 now more stable than 4.9rc

2003-09-30 Thread Eriq Lamar
It just seems that there are alot of issues w/ 4.9, doesn't seem stable at all. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"