On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 10:21:32AM +0200, Oliver Braun wrote:
> BTW, why have you added BUILD_DEPENDS= perl:${PORTSDIR}/lang/perl5 to
> net/rsync? Only for the patches?
Correct, for the use of "perl -pi -e".
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in th
* David O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-18 05:32]:
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2002 at 02:30:29PM +0200, Oliver Braun wrote:
> > The problem is that sed(1) on -current fails with "sed -i.bak file", if
> > file.bak already exists, but perl does not.
> Please file a PR about this.
done
> > Since net/r
On Sun, Jun 16, 2002 at 02:30:29PM +0200, Oliver Braun wrote:
> ==> ${REINPLACE_CMD} has different semantics on -current and -stable
>
> Maintainer only using -stable won't be able to get that error and fix it
> _before_ submitting.
Yeah, I really don't like this. At the very minimum there nee
* Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-16 20:20]:
> Oliver Braun wrote:
> > The problem is that sed(1) on -current fails with "sed -i.bak file", if
> > file.bak already exists, but perl does not. Since net/rsync/Makefile
> > uses 3 ${REINPLACE_CMD}s on one file (rsync.h), I have removed the
>
Oliver Braun wrote:
> The problem is that sed(1) on -current fails with "sed -i.bak file", if
> file.bak already exists, but perl does not. Since net/rsync/Makefile
> uses 3 ${REINPLACE_CMD}s on one file (rsync.h), I have removed the
> backup file with ${RM} file.bak between the calls.
>
> ==> $
[CC ports@ and current@]
* Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-16 13:02]:
> Looks like the ${REINPLACE_CMD} patch didn't work:
> http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/5-latest/rsync-2.5.5_1.log
Fixed in PR ports/39365.
But I am not very happy with that fix.
The problem is that sed(1) on -
