> I have problem with an ASUS DRW-1609P with both 5.3 and 5.4. It won't
> write any media. Even "burncd" fails with the following error:
>
> (Yes, I know I have "test" mode on, I got tired of making coasters)
>
> > burncd -f /dev/acd0 -s max -v -t data file.iso fixate
> > adding type 0x08 file
I have problem with an ASUS DRW-1609P with both 5.3 and 5.4. It won't
write any media. Even "burncd" fails with the following error:
(Yes, I know I have "test" mode on, I got tired of making coasters)
> burncd -f /dev/acd0 -s max -v -t data file.iso fixate
> adding type 0x08 file mp3.iso.aa siz
> What is the proper method for submitting cores along with
> backtraces to the FreeBSD development team? Is it useful to
> submit cores, or is the backtrace sufficient?
Firstly, GNATS works over email and sending in a 4GB+ MIME
encoded core file could overload the mail servers of not
just th
Hello,
I have a few recent 5.3 panics I would like to submit. send-pr always bails
telling me that it is
out of space, despite the fact that the local filesystems have plenty of space
free:
pixie# send-pr -a ./backtrace -a ./uname-output -a ./messages -a
./sysctl-a-output -a ./dmesg.outpu
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 01:12:42AM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 00:34, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > > You may want to check out timeout(9) / untimeout(9), see man 9 timeout
> > > for details.
> >
> > You should not use timeout(9) without a very good reason, the callout_*
> >
On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 00:34, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > You may want to check out timeout(9) / untimeout(9), see man 9 timeout
> > for details.
>
> You should not use timeout(9) without a very good reason, the callout_*
> interface is prefered.
Can someone add a warning to the top of the makefile
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 10:10:52AM -0400, Bill Vermillion wrote:
> On or about Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 12:01 , while attempting a
> Zarathustra emulation [EMAIL PROTECTED] thus spake:
>
>
>
> > Message: 4
> > Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:58:02 -0500 (CDT)
> > From: "H. S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sub
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 03:21:08PM +0200, Marc Olzheim wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 01:08:21AM -0400, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
> > I'll spare a lengthy write-up because I think the patch documents it well
> > enough. It certainly appears to fix things here when doing very large
> > blo
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 06:03:11AM -0700, ALeine wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > DELAY() in FreeBSD uses a busy loop . I am looking for something
> > like sleep_on_timeout() call in Linux . (dont' want to waste the CPU
> > cycles by DELAY'ing)
>
> You may want to check out timeout(9) /
On or about Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 12:01 , while attempting a
Zarathustra emulation [EMAIL PROTECTED] thus spake:
> Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:58:02 -0500 (CDT)
> From: "H. S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: imminent disk failure ?
...
> I have a server running 4.X for almost two ye
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 01:08:21AM -0400, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
> I'll spare a lengthy write-up because I think the patch documents it well
> enough. It certainly appears to fix things here when doing very large
> block-sized writes, but it also reduces the throughput with those block
>
> sleep_on_timeout() call in Linux . (dont' want to waste the CPU cycles
You may want to try the manual pages.
% man -k sleep | fgrep '(9)'
endtsleep(9), sleepinit(9), unsleep(9) - manage the queues of sleeping processes
init_sleepqueues(9) ... sleepq_wai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> DELAY() in FreeBSD uses a busy loop . I am looking for something
> like sleep_on_timeout() call in Linux . (dont' want to waste the CPU
> cycles by DELAY'ing)
You may want to check out timeout(9) / untimeout(9), see man 9 timeout
for details.
> As I am pretty new to
On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 21:46, Dipjyoti Saikia wrote:
> DELAY() in FreeBSD uses a busy loop . I am looking for something like
> sleep_on_timeout() call in Linux . (dont' want to waste the CPU cycles
> by DELAY'ing)
tsleep/msleep/timeout are probably what you want.
--
Daniel O'Connor software and ne
Hi,
DELAY() in FreeBSD uses a busy loop . I am looking for something like
sleep_on_timeout() call in Linux . (dont' want to waste the CPU cycles
by DELAY'ing)
As I am pretty new to programming with Free BSD , can you help me
with some details about equivalent implementation(wait queues etc) in
All,
as I wrote last week:
> Submissions are due on April 15. Thanks a lot, and we are hoping for a
> big turn-out.
As always this is not final, but please get your reports ready by monday and
maybe let us know that you are planing to submit. Unfortunately we have a
dramatically lower turn-ou
16 matches
Mail list logo
