John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday 16 January 2006 00:08, Kamal R. Prasad wrote:
you mean, boosting the priority of a reader would be required to avoid
priority inversion, but difficult to implement?
regards
-kamal
On 1/14/06, John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think you just kind
On Tuesday 17 January 2006 14:00, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Monday 16 January 2006 00:08, Kamal R. Prasad wrote:
> > > you mean, boosting the priority of a reader would be required to avoid
> > > priority inversion, but difficult to implement?
> > >
> >
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Monday 16 January 2006 00:08, Kamal R. Prasad wrote:
> > you mean, boosting the priority of a reader would be required to avoid
> > priority inversion, but difficult to implement?
> >
> > regards
> > -kamal
> >
> > On 1/14/06, John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROT
On Monday 16 January 2006 00:08, Kamal R. Prasad wrote:
> you mean, boosting the priority of a reader would be required to avoid
> priority inversion, but difficult to implement?
>
> regards
> -kamal
>
> On 1/14/06, John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think you just kind of punt and do a
Daichi GOTO ha scritto:
> I have updated the patches:
>
> For 7-current patch
> http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs-p5.diff
>
> For 6.x patch
> http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs6-p5.diff
>
> Changes from -p4:
> - fixed around "can't fifo/vnode bypass -
> See http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=91879 for the patch. I
> went ahead and fixed all the filesystems I could find, since they all
> had nearly identical code.
I just looked at your changes (and at ufs_reclaim()).
I'll get this committed to current and it'll get MFC'ed.
mohan
Antti Korpela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I need patch to raise FreeBSD 6.0 default pty/tty-limit (256) UP or OFF.
I already gave you a patch. Your unwillingness to provide the
information necessary to figure out why my patch doesn't work for you
is entirely *your* problem.
> In shell-producti
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 12:23:51PM -0300, Evandro Sestrem wrote:
>
> It compiles ok, but when it is linking I got these errors:
-lm
Joerg
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscr
> In what version of FreeBSD (or libc) these functions (sin, cos,
> tan, ...) were implemented?
Are you linking with libm?
--
FreeBSD Volunteer, http://people.freebsd.org/~jkoshy
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/
> /usr/local/lib//liblualib.a(lmathlib.o): In function 'math_sin':
> lmathlib.o(.text+0x52): undefined reference to 'sin'
Hardly a hackers@ question, but you should link with the math library
libm by using the '-lm' switch to the linker.
--
rea
BOFH excuse #55:
Plumber mistook routing panel for
on 17/1/06 18:23, Evandro Sestrem at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying compile a project using Lua 5.0 (www.lua.org) in FreePascal
> (2.0.2 [2005/11/17] for i386) in a FreeBSD 4.1.
>
> The Lua 5.0 is correctly installed.
>
> It compiles ok, but when it is linking I got these e
On Tuesday 17 January 2006 16:23, Evandro Sestrem wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying compile a project using Lua 5.0 (www.lua.org) in FreePascal
> (2.0.2 [2005/11/17] for i386) in a FreeBSD 4.1.
>
> The Lua 5.0 is correctly installed.
>
> It compiles ok, but when it is linking I got these errors:
>
> /
Hello,
I'm trying compile a project using Lua 5.0 (www.lua.org) in FreePascal
(2.0.2 [2005/11/17] for i386) in a FreeBSD 4.1.
The Lua 5.0 is correctly installed.
It compiles ok, but when it is linking I got these errors:
/usr/local/lib//liblualib.a(lmathlib.o): In function 'math_sin':
lmathli
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 04:55:14PM +, Tofik Suleymanov wrote:
> Could someone show me how to add new sysctl to the system ?
You have an example in /usr/share/examples/kld/dyn_sysctl/.
--
La prueba mas fehaciente de que existe vida inteligente en otros
planetas, es que no han intentado contac
Then complain to their isp.
That has solved most problems for me, and in any case it'll stop or
you know it's your problem and not theirs.
If you can query your domain by switching your default nameservers to
your machine's default NS, and not see any debug messages, you should
be fine and compla
Could someone show me how to add new sysctl to the system ?
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Steve Suhre wrote:
Thanks, I think that's what I was looking for. I expect the "ISP" is in
another country somewhere and would be hard to reach, if they could be
reached at all. And it's probably a bad reference somewhere to the
server here, so shutting of recursive queries could help... If I s
there is some code in dragonflybsd to checkpoint a process. It will write
the pagetable to disk. Since the internal data structures aren't much
different -you should be able to copy over that code to freebsd. But you
will run into problems with file descriptors that are not of type vnode (eg
fifo/s
Thanks, I think that's what I was looking for. I expect the "ISP" is in
another country somewhere and would be hard to reach, if they could be
reached at all. And it's probably a bad reference somewhere to the
server here, so shutting of recursive queries could help... If I shut
named off fo
Hello,
I wanted to save the whole context of the process, thats why I want
the access to each page allocated to the process of our interest. And
further I want to write all these pages on to swap.
The final objective is to save the context of a stopped process on
the swap and restore
20 matches
Mail list logo