Re: RFC: Big Makefile patch for WARNS settings

2009-10-13 Thread Doug Barton
Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > The "default" would be the setting inherited by, eg, > src/bin/Makefile.inc. This already has a WARNS=6, are you saying that > debugging stuff under bin/ has been made more difficult by that change? It certainly can be, yes. Although admittedly I don't spend a lot of time

Re: sysinstall colours

2009-10-13 Thread Michiel Overtoom
On Saturday 10 October 2009 01:59:32 Randi Harper wrote: > All the problems with sysinstall, and your idea is to > change the color? [...] Fancy colors seems to me like a wrong focus of attention too... but maybe it would be nice to be able to run sysinstall in monochrome mode, for maximum cont

Re: crashtar

2009-10-13 Thread Alexander Best
Mikolaj Golub schrieb am 2009-10-10: > On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 12:34:05 +0200 (CEST) Alexander Best wrote: > AB> thanks. this is a cool script and very useful indeed. only thing > you might > AB> want to do is check for root privileges at the beginning to > avoid nasty error > AB> messages like.

Re: RFC: Big Makefile patch for WARNS settings

2009-10-13 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
Hi Doug, On Mon, 12.10.2009 at 16:49:47 -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > > Dear -hackers, > > > > I would like you to give me your thoughts on the attached patch. There > > are no functional changes, what I'm trying to do is introduce WARNS?=6 > > for all top-level Makefiles a