re: compiling ports with SSP (was: [PATCH] Add -lssp_nonshared to GCC's LIB_SPEC unconditionally)=

2012-02-26 Thread Bryan Drewery
Jeremie, Thanks for this patch [1]! I've been building my ports tree with -fstack-protector on FreeBSD 6, 7 and 8. Once I upgraded to 8, I started running into the issue [2] this patch is fixing. I have a situation where non-ports applications are compiling statically, which ran into this. Speci

Re: [RFT][patch] Scheduling for HTT and not only

2012-02-26 Thread George Mitchell
On 02/26/12 19:32, George Mitchell wrote: > [...] SCHED_ULE's poor performance for > interactive processes with a full load on interactive processes. It ^^ Should be "of compute-bound". > doesn't help. -- George Mitchell > __

Re: [RFT][patch] Scheduling for HTT and not only

2012-02-26 Thread George Mitchell
On 02/17/12 12:03, Alexander Motin wrote: On 17.02.2012 18:53, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Alexander Motin wrote: [...]So I believe this code works as it should. Here is the patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~mav/sched.htt40.patch I plan this to be a final patch of

Re: Blackhole routes vs firewall drop rules

2012-02-26 Thread Bob Bishop
On 26 Feb 2012, at 21:14, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Sunday, February 26, 2012 a las 01:05:11PM -0800, Julian Elischer > escribió: > >> On 2/26/12 5:34 AM, Bob Bishop wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'd like to hear from somebody who understands this stuff on the relative >>> merits of blackhole r

Re: Blackhole routes vs firewall drop rules

2012-02-26 Thread Damien Fleuriot
On 26 Feb 2012, at 14:34, Bob Bishop wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to hear from somebody who understands this stuff on the relative > merits of blackhole routes vs firewall drop rules for dealing with packets > from unwanted sources. I'm particularly interested in efficiency and > scalability. T

Re: o

2012-02-26 Thread Julian Elischer
On 2/26/12 1:14 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote: El día Sunday, February 26, 2012 a las 01:05:11PM -0800, Julian Elischer escribió: On 2/26/12 5:34 AM, Bob Bishop wrote: Hi, I'd like to hear from somebody who understands this stuff on the relative merits of blackhole routes vs firewall drop rules

Re: o

2012-02-26 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Sunday, February 26, 2012 a las 01:05:11PM -0800, Julian Elischer escribió: > On 2/26/12 5:34 AM, Bob Bishop wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to hear from somebody who understands this stuff on the relative > > merits of blackhole routes vs firewall drop rules for dealing with packets > >

Re: Blackhole routes vs firewall drop rules

2012-02-26 Thread Julian Elischer
let's try that again with the right Subject: line On 2/26/12 1:05 PM, Julian Elischer wrote: On 2/26/12 5:34 AM, Bob Bishop wrote: Hi, I'd like to hear from somebody who understands this stuff on the relative merits of blackhole routes vs firewall drop rules for dealing with packets from unw

o

2012-02-26 Thread Julian Elischer
On 2/26/12 5:34 AM, Bob Bishop wrote: Hi, I'd like to hear from somebody who understands this stuff on the relative merits of blackhole routes vs firewall drop rules for dealing with packets from unwanted sources. I'm particularly interested in efficiency and scalability. Thanks the key is

Blackhole routes vs firewall drop rules

2012-02-26 Thread Bob Bishop
Hi, I'd like to hear from somebody who understands this stuff on the relative merits of blackhole routes vs firewall drop rules for dealing with packets from unwanted sources. I'm particularly interested in efficiency and scalability. Thanks -- Bob Bishop r...@gid.co.uk ___

DTrace: Where do we run CTFCONVERT for kernel modules

2012-02-26 Thread Shrikanth Kamath
...meaning, I see the following line in "sys/conf/kmod.mk", but that is a CTFMERGE command. .if defined(MK_CTF) && ${MK_CTF} != "no" ${CTFMERGE} ${CTFFLAGS} -o ${.TARGET} ${OBJS} .endif Where do we run the CTFCONVERT on kernel modules? -- Shrikanth R K ___