On 8/26/2013 5:09 PM, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 12:29:30PM -0400, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
The new framework would let me rely on the environment instead of $0,
which, IMO, is more reliable. I'd need to be able to tell periodic to
run that script with the daily, weekly and mont
Darren
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 12:29:30PM -0400, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> >> On 8/25/2013 7:05 AM, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> >>> And the following variables to control whether you want each check to
> >>> run "daily", "weekly" or directly from "crontab" (the default, backward
> >>> compatible values
On 8/25/2013 1:37 PM, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Hi Darren,
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 12:45:22PM -0400, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
On 8/25/2013 7:05 AM, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
And the following variables to control whether you want each check to
run "daily", "weekly" or directly from "crontab" (the default
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 05:03:32PM +0100, RW wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Aug 2013 22:03:58 +0200
> Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
>
> > I've implemented it here:
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~jlh/security_status_period.diff
> >
>
> Doesn't this mean that if you want to run "periodic security" from
> crontab or
On Sun, 25 Aug 2013 22:03:58 +0200
Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> I've implemented it here:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~jlh/security_status_period.diff
>
Doesn't this mean that if you want to run "periodic security" from
crontab or manually etc, you have to override every single entry to
"crontab" in
On 23/08/2013 15:23, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I am using FreeBSD-9-STABLE on the following hardware:
>
> FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 24 CPUs
> FreeBSD/SMP: 2 package(s) x 6 core(s) x 2 SMT threads
>
> So I have 2 physical CPUs with 6 core each.
>
> # cpuset -g
> pi
6 matches
Mail list logo
