Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sheldon Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Is there a good reason why sysctl(8) won't display _any_ output for
> > opaque MIB entries named as arguments?
> Yes it will, with -X. The interesting question is
ex, and why it doesn't
print a message when it omits printing an opaque variable.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
rt's content even if you're no
longer root.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
rnel
Ask the freebsd-small mailing list.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
e
segment descriptor.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
hrough the source of fetch and libfetch, and
> it seems like there's some stub code that hasn't been flushed out
> completely. Anyone know of any plans to finish this up?
Feel free to send patches :)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail
Jason Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > I ran into this bug while analyzing a customer's logs to determine the
> > best time of day for an upgrade. The original script was in Perl, but
> > I rewrote it in C because it was t
- and in any case, this is irrelevant.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
712
20 | 816
21 |## 2446
22 |###### 500
23 |## 326
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/*
* Copyright (c) 2001 ThinkSec AS. All rights reserved.
*
* $ThinkSec$
*/
#include
#include
#include
#include
static int
eate approximately one 68GB swap partition.
"approximately one"? :)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You could take a look at www.FreeBSD.org/handbook/kerneldebug.html
> and provide a bit more details about that crash; at the very least,
> a 'where' or 'bt' would be useful.
That, and a dmesg, or at least una
an
do about cleaning them up and committing them.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Dan Phoenix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [...]
Try ktrace instead, it provides much more detailed information.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
ut the setting of the break.
Ahem.
The other way around, actually (we increased KVM space from 256 MB to
1 GB - not 2 GB as you claim). And the problem with legacy BSDI
binaries (newer ones don't have this problem) was fixed a long time
ago, in 3.0 (before 3.0-RELEASE).
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smo
Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 04:53:34PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > There was at the time - socketpair(2) had totally slipped my mind ;)
> > Umm, you want pipe(
Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There was at the time - socketpair(2) had totally slipped my mind ;)
Umm, you want pipe(2), not socketpair(2).
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-h
* 1,7
! the
little
! horse
! jumped
! over
! the
! fence
--- 1,7
! three
! ducks
! swim
! in
! a
little
! pond
des@flood ~% diff -u old new
--- old Sun Mar 11 03:07:31 2001
+++ new Sun Mar 11 03:08:08 2001
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-the
+three
+ducks
+swim
+in
+a
little
-horse
-jumped
-over
& PLAY OS" *on* and add 'options PNPBIOS' to your
kernel. If that doesn't solve your problem, we have a bug.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
43991 freevnodes
>
> well vmstat showing 100% busy and iostat showing 10% busy..
No, -vmstat and -iostat are showing 13 and 12 tps (transactions per
second), respectively. -iostat doesn't show a "busy percentage".
DES
--
Dag-
e" (note to self: get more sleep)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Anton Berezin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So is there a way, or is not?
No. If there was a way to tell it'd be a bug.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
e
> > disk, but would like to *know* when it nevertheless does.
> OK, doing a stat and checking the mtime should give you
> the info at the expense of polling, I can't think of another way.
Won't help. You'll get the same mtime no matter whether the file is
actually
Tony Finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What about setrlimit(RLIMIMT_DATA)?
Yep, I'd forgotten about that. Malloc() will return NULL if you hit
your data size limit.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "
"Daniel C. Sobral" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It doesn't work. The application killed by reason of insufficient
> resources is not (necessarily) the one that causes the page fault
> leading to that.
This is arguably a bug which needs to be fixed.
DES
--
Kenneth Wayne Culver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 24 Feb 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > Kenneth Wayne Culver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > FreeBSD supports cardbus in -CURRENT, but I wouldn't expect it to ever
> > > support cardbus in 4.x.
ilable before you actually get
to dirty the pages that were allocated.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Seebach) writes:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes:
> >Malloc() does not overcommit - the kernel does. Malloc() doesn't know
> >and doesn't care.
> But it could still probably force the behavior.
Barring kernel
Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> if (sigsetjmp(env) == -1) {
Blah, this should be
if (sigsetjmp(env, 1) == -1) {
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers"
ll give
you a chunk of memory that's already mapped and you'll be fine, but
sometimes (when allocating beyond what was previously used) it won't.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
thing until you dirty one
page too many and segfault.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
thank you very much, but it takes some
hand-holding.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
e the old 'config & make' method uses a
compile directory in /usr/src.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
oject that directly or indirectly
depends on every other, you can also just specify that one file on the
command line.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
ility to correctly
detect if a dependency is out of date is irrelevant.
Also, my experience is that unless you're paying Sun significant
amounts of $$, their reaction to bug reports is to close their eyes,
hum real loud and hope they go away.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsub
Robin Cutshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Any ideas as to why it would take almost three times longer to build
> on FreeBSD?
Yup: 4.x sucks at SMP. Try the comparison again with uniprocessor
kernels - I expect you'll see a much smaller difference.
DES
--
Dag-Erling
#x27;t trigger it to be
> recompiled by the kernel make process.
Of course not. It's not part of the kernel. There's a duplicate of
this file in /usr/src/sys/netinet which need to be kept in synch.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTE
of jobs boosts performance to a certain point;
past this point, performance starts decreasing again.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
on disk.
Don't be so sure. Stuff on disk has to be read into memory, and this
is generally done by DMAing it off the disk, which locks the memroy
bus, then copying it out into userland. With an MFS you skip the first
part, unless MFS is stupider than I thought.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgra
Jordan Hubbard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [...] That implies to me, at least, that after a certain
> point the CPU is going to be the bottleneck.
More likely RAM bandwidth. Those 133 Mhz FSBs ought to help, though.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
box,
probably with a 100 MHz or 133 MHz FSB, not the old 486DX33 you have
lying in a corner.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
tc. becomes insignificant next to the time spent doing I/O,
and if you're already doing I/O as fast as you can there's no room for
improvement. On a machine with a slower CPU or a faster I/O system,
you'd see improvement.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsu
ying I-told-you-so when it eventually
> breaks.)
Get a better job. Skilled IT workers are rare enough that they
shouldn't need to put up with such crap, and shouldn't have any
trouble getting a new job when the crap starts flying.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To U
ot; RAM, then touches every page during startup.
Unless some form of clustering is done, this causes 16384 write
operations for a 64 MB virtual machine...
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
grade. When you're sure
you've got it down pat, take the production box down for however long
you need to upgrade it (somewhere between half an hour and two hours
depending on disk speeds and how much tinkering is needed).
DES (been there, done that)
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
t available at the time.
Well, it was a stupid decision at that time, and the decision not to
upgrade or replace these machines now is even stupider.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
slowdown to try to
narrow down the day (or even the week) on which it occurred?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
bugs (except for some, but not all, known security holes) about half a
year ago. If you absolutely must run RELENG_3, don't run anything but
the very latest 3.5-STABLE (cvsup and cvs are your friends).
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PR
Chet Ramey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bash uses the presence of SSH_CLIENT to decide whether or not to run the
> shell startup files for a non-interactive shell (like it attempts to do
> for rsh). [...]
Feh. Here's a nickel, kid, get yourself a real shell.
DES
--
vijay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, I am new to FreeBSD. I wanted to know if I can play audio
> CDs on "my" system.
'man cdcontrol'
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
ost of it really isn't
deep voodoo and you can understand it if you try. In my experience,
this psychological block is a much bigger obstacle to overcome than
actual technical complexity.
(hmm, I must remember to drop by Mustang Jack next time I'm in NYC)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL P
Zhiui Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there a way to specify a kernel other than /kernel to boot from? I do
> not want to do this manually, I want to put it into some configuration
> file. Thanks,
'man loader'
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alexander Langer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thus spake Dag-Erling Smorgrav ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Alexander Langer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > There recently (last week or something) was a thread here or on
> > > another mailinglist on how to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alexander Langer) writes:
> There recently (last week or something) was a thread here or on
> another mailinglist on how to debug kernel moduls, which is a little
> bit tricky.
It's also documented in the handbook.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL P
Jos Backus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This patch gets rid of the Broken pipe messages.
No need to name the loop...
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
could
> only be changed setting some option in the kernel and compiling a new
> one.
Congratulations, you just invented capabilities! :)
http://www.trustedbsd.org/
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
return (value); what happens ?
If the value you return is non-zero, see above. If it's zero, the
userland syscall code returns p->p_retval[0] to the caller.
> * Does this logic also apply to the Linux syscall stuff in the kernel?
I think so. Marcel would be better placed to answer
"Crist J. Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 01:51:43AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > Chris Stenton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Fatal server error:
> > > xf86OpenConsole: Server must be suid root
> >
Chris Stenton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Fatal server error:
> xf86OpenConsole: Server must be suid root
This is your clue.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "un
before; we managed to
chroot the scripts so we're reasonably confident that they can't do
much harm except to themselves.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
;ll only screw it up"... I'm
tempted to reply "not much more than it already is". Eivind and I
rewrote it for our previous employer, but the mod is part of a large
chunk of proprietary code, unfortunately.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mai
oes not set
resource limits; nor does it chroot as far as I recall.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
.. "if you do it quickly, nobody will notice"
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jamie Heckford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > In all honesty, I am just looking for something to play
> > with and see how fast FreeBSD can go.
> I'd say about 2.8 m/s/s, given sufficient height.
Doh! I mean
Jamie Heckford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In all honesty, I am just looking for something to play
> with and see how fast FreeBSD can go.
I'd say about 2.8 m/s/s, given sufficient height.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAI
"Julian Stacey [EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Penguin mascot has enough advantages over Chuck already !
Then why do I get this urge to go bowling every time I see Tux?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EM
r kern.maxfiles.
> Someone told me to store these limits (above) in
> a etc/sysctl.conf file but when I went to etc that
> file wasn't in there .. do I have to newly create the
> file or should it already be there?
'man sysctl.conf'
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTEC
ery well received. The 3.1-RELEASE and 3.2-RELEASE CD
sets had the "waiter beastie" graphic (the one on 3.1 had no tail!),
but by 3.3 WC had reverted to Hosokawa-san's "beastie coming out of a
CD" artwork.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscrib
Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 01:44:34PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > Volker Stolz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 01:35:08PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > > > What are you
Volker Stolz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 01:35:08PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > What are you guys smoking?
> *shrug* Can you spell "event-driven"? There are ways to do things much
> more elegantly today (see all the references to
f the directory exists; make sure to differentiate between
"somebody already holds the lock" and "the lock can't be created due
to permission errors or some other problem" by examining $!)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAI
mmer. In other words you can write a program
> exactly like another, if you can prove you never saw the other
> program. If you saw the similar program you are dirty.
AT&T (or Novell, don't remember if it was before or after the sale of
USL) tried to use that argument against UCB. It
C_CPU
> int cpu_is_vpc;
> #endif
> and not break anyone's heart?
No. Check cpu_vendor at probe/attach time and set a flag in the
interface's softc that indicates that it needs to be treated as a VPC
emulated interface.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
correctly sets cpu_vendor to "ConnectixCPU"
(rather than e.g. "GenuineIntel" or "AuthenticAMD") you can just check
against that. It's declared in .
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Office.
> If you want to run both Netscape and StarOffice at the same time, 128MB
> isn't enough. Sigh.
Avoid StarOffice like the plague. It's neat, but it leaks like a
sieve, and barely crawls along on my 450 MHz K6-2.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsu
ta_command: timeout waiting for intr
> ata0-master: ata_command: identify failed
> ad2: 39082MB [79406/16/63] at ata1-master UDMA66
>
I bet your CD-ROM is incorrectly configured as master.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [
ust like you want an odd (and
preferably prime) stripe size on RAIDs to (amongst other reasons)
avoid having all the superblock backups end up on the same disk.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers&qu
f the expected number of users (724 in your case -
closest primes are 719 and 727), create that many bucket directories,
and place each user in bucket ID mod K.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
itute for reading src/sys/sys/sysctl.h.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
27;t
> it - how often the saver is called to do its dance..
kern.* is not the right place for this. It should go in user.*, unless
that is reserved for userland, in which case a subtree of kern.* is
probably the Right Thing.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: s
Wes Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> BSD for the masses.
"BSD on every desk and in every home"
DES (ducks, runs)
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
packets for port 23 and detect if a user logged on?
> I'm pretty unsure about this..
Why don't you tell us what you want to do, instead of how you think it
must be done?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubs
Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Remy Nonnenmacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Well, I may think using this solution if it remains portable between
> > Unixes.
> It's perfectly portable, with one small variation - on BSD systems,
> yo
ptor to /dev/zero (or was it /dev/null?)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
"G. Adam Stanislav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 06:11:06PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> >The second and third sentences of the second paragraph (the one that
> >starts on line 23), as well as the entire eighth paragraph (that
>
"G. Adam Stanislav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 04:32:29PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > Did you even read the man page?
> Many times, actually. And on different days, too. :)
No, you didn't. You probably read the first line, t
Brandon Fosdick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > "Recently"? nslookup has been officially deprecated for about a year
> > and a half, I believe.
> Will a replacement be added to the base distro? When?
1) nslookup is still in the b
It talks about passing an address to the
> function. I don't get it... What address? I want it to allocate memory
> for me and tell me its address. How am I supposed to know what address
> is available???
Did you even read the man page?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL P
Enemy said it before: don't believe the hype. In this case, the hype
> that an Internet year is only a few weeks of wallclock time.
I'm sure there must be some meaning to what you write, but it keeps
eluding me.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send
Yusuf Goolamabbas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Recently there was a message indicating that ISC is deprecating
> nslookup.
"Recently"? nslookup has been officially deprecated for about a year
and a half, I believe.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Uns
ther messages, with timestamps, to various log
files located in /var/log (most prominently /var/log/messages) as
specified in /etc/syslogd.conf.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> [...]
> Jessem.
Amazing what people will do to evade killfiles. Plonk.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
void <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there any reason top couldn't add these up and report a %iowait
> like Solaris'?
Yes. It would conceal valuable information. Do the adding up in your
head.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
Andrzej Bialecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 7 Nov 2000, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > # load -t md /filesystemfile
> > Shouldn't that be 'load -t md_root'?
> Actually, it's md_im
x27;t Do That. Sorry.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
any reason that FreeBSD doesn't have such a state?
It has several, depending on the type of I/O the process is waiting
for: biord (waiting for a read operation to complete), biowr (waiting
for a write operation to complete), select (waiting for descriptors to
become readable / writable), etc.
Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> # load -t md /filesystemfile
Shouldn't that be 'load -t md_root'?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
he errno (in your example, open(2)
returned 2, which is ENOENT, i.e. the file didn't exist). If it
succeeded, the value returned is the result (a file descriptor in
open(2)'s case).
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "
James Housley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I believe a correct and true statement is "FreeBSD is a direct decendant
> of Unix(TM). Based on the BSD sources"
I don't think there's all that much left of the original BSD
sources... at least not in the kernel.
DES
nd the
'll' format modifier) has been in the works for most of the previous
decade, and was ratified (as ISO/IEC 9899:1999) on December 16th,
1999, but gcc still seems to live in 1989-land.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Will someone please inform the gcc developers of the last decade's
advances in C standardization? Yes, Virginia, ISO C (it's not ISO C
any more, and hasn't been since 1989) does support 'long long' and the
'll' format.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PRO
101 - 200 of 489 matches
Mail list logo
