Re: rc.d scripts to control multiple instances of the same daemon?

2013-06-26 Thread Alex Dupre
Garrett Wollman ha scritto: > I've looked around for examples of good practice to emulate, and > haven't found much. The closest to what I want looks to be > vboxheadless, but I'm uncomfortable with the amount of mechanism from > rc.subr that it needs to reimplement. Are there any better examples

Re: rc.d scripts to control multiple instances of the same daemon?

2013-06-25 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 03:44:31PM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote: > I'm in the process of (re)writing an rc.d script for kadmind > (security/krb5). Unlike the main Kerberos daemon, kadmind needs to > have a separate instance for each realm on the server -- it can't > support multiple realms in a si

Re: rc.d scripts to control multiple instances of the same daemon?

2013-06-25 Thread Pietro Cerutti
On 2013-Jun-25, 15:44, Garrett Wollman wrote: > I'm in the process of (re)writing an rc.d script for kadmind > (security/krb5). Unlike the main Kerberos daemon, kadmind needs to > have a separate instance for each realm on the server -- it can't > support multiple realms in a single process. What

Re: rc.d scripts to control multiple instances of the same daemon?

2013-06-25 Thread olli hauer
On 2013-06-25 21:44, Garrett Wollman wrote: > I'm in the process of (re)writing an rc.d script for kadmind > (security/krb5). Unlike the main Kerberos daemon, kadmind needs to > have a separate instance for each realm on the server -- it can't > support multiple realms in a single process. What I

Re: rc.d scripts to control multiple instances of the same daemon?

2013-06-25 Thread Ian Lepore
On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 15:44 -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote: > I'm in the process of (re)writing an rc.d script for kadmind > (security/krb5). Unlike the main Kerberos daemon, kadmind needs to > have a separate instance for each realm on the server -- it can't > support multiple realms in a single pr