I'm working on getting linux/alpha compatability going in
FreeBSD/alpha I stumbled over some odd fork behaviour that I was
hoping somebody could shed some light on.
Specifically, when a linux/alpha process forks, the child's return
value is the parent's pid rather than zero. I tracked this
On Thu, Aug 26, 1999 at 10:40:29AM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
[...]
Specifically, when a linux/alpha process forks, the child's return
value is the parent's pid rather than zero.
[...]
If I run the following code on FreeBSD/i386, I see:
parent's pid = 6730
I am the child, result = 0
I
I'm working on getting linux/alpha compatability going in
FreeBSD/alpha I stumbled over some odd fork behaviour that I was
hoping somebody could shed some light on.
Specifically, when a linux/alpha process forks, the child's return
value is the parent's pid rather than zero. I tracked
On Fri, 27 Aug 1999 02:20:52 + (GMT)
Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a bug.
...but it's a bug in fork(), too. Not just vfork().
For other bugs in vfork(), look at the fact that the vacation
program does not correctly deal with messages.
...fwiw, NetBSD fixed the
I'm working on getting linux/alpha compatability going in
FreeBSD/alpha I stumbled over some odd fork behaviour that I was
hoping somebody could shed some light on.
Specifically, when a linux/alpha process forks, the child's return
value is the parent's pid rather than zero. I tracked this
On Thu, Aug 26, 1999 at 10:40:29AM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
[...]
Specifically, when a linux/alpha process forks, the child's return
value is the parent's pid rather than zero.
[...]
If I run the following code on FreeBSD/i386, I see:
parent's pid = 6730
I am the child, result = 0
I
I'm working on getting linux/alpha compatability going in
FreeBSD/alpha I stumbled over some odd fork behaviour that I was
hoping somebody could shed some light on.
Specifically, when a linux/alpha process forks, the child's return
value is the parent's pid rather than zero. I tracked
On Fri, 27 Aug 1999 02:20:52 + (GMT)
Terry Lambert tlamb...@primenet.com wrote:
This is a bug.
...but it's a bug in fork(), too. Not just vfork().
For other bugs in vfork(), look at the fact that the vacation
program does not correctly deal with messages.
...fwiw, NetBSD fixed the
8 matches
Mail list logo