Am 22.11.2010 22:16, schrieb Andriy Gapon:
If I need to call a function func on a specific CPU which one of the following I
should use?
1.
smp_rendezvous_cpus(1<< cpuid, ..., func, ...);
2.
sched_bind(cpuid);
func();
sched_unbind();
Or does it depend on some additional factors?
What are the m
//fcvs co src" will get you up and running.
Ready to do "cvs diff -u" to check for the local changes you made etc.
As a side note: If you can't figure out simple questions like this by
your self, you will have a hard time to do actual development. We
prov
kernel. More to the point, could you provide "fin"
in frames 8 through 12 and the local variables in frame 8, too?
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | [E
Thanks, looking forward to your reports.
[1] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/monthly.cgi
[2] http://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-sample.xml
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/
port-sample.xml
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/ \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News
pgpq0lbzySxB1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello again,
kind reminder that the repdigit date is on this Saturday! So far we have
received only 18 reports - I know there is more going on out there.
Please let the world know what kind of cool stuff is going on in FreeBSD!
On Sunday 24 June 2007, Max Laier wrote:
> it's that ti
I suggest looking at John-Mark Gurney's 2006 BSDCan presentation:
http://www.bsdcan.org/2006/papers/freebsd.device.driver.slides.pdf
http://www.bsdcan.org/2006/papers/freebsd.driver.pdf
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier
I didn't see anything about this new-wave-of-user-friendly-bsd going on
> the list.. have I missed something?
And your complaint would be ... what exactly?
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X ht
xtended attributes and only allowing execution of signed
executables ...
http://perforce.freebsd.org/fileLogView.cgi?FSPC=//depot/projects/trustedbsd/mac/sys/security/mac%5fchkexec/mac%5fchkexec.c
...
not sure what became of it, though.
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTE
.
There is no guarantee that it has actually seen every packet and once a
segment (that the primary has ACKed) is lost, there's no way to get it
back.
I think you should rather look at session management in the application
and move away from long-lived TCP connections for that purpose.
d
> >>
> >> the tarball to now include procstat.h. If there are any other
> >> problems, do
> >>
> >> let me know.
> >>
> >> Robert N M Watson
> >> Computer Laboratory
> >> University of Cambridge
>
> __
ys/types.h (xor param.h) is supposed to be the first include (other than
cdefs.h) according to style. The rest seems fine from a quick glance.
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X http://pf4freebsd.love2p
s/kernel.h:extern int tick; /* usec per tick (100 / hz) */
sys/kernel.h:extern int hz; /* system clock's frequency */
The actual value for hz comes from your kernel configuration. The default
is "options HZ=1000" at the moment.
--
/"\ Best regards,
can cause such results?
I didn't see bzero accounted for in any of the traces in this thread -
makes me wonder if that might mean that it's counted within uma_zalloc?
Maybe we are calling it twice by accident? I wasn't quite able to figure
out the logic of M_ZERO vs. UMA_ZON
i0 1500 192.168.1 192.168.1.5 3034 - 2825-
> -
> lo0 16384 80 8 0
> 0
> lo0 16384 127 127.0.0.1 8- 8 -
> -
> ib01500 00:c0:ee:22:03:
ment a new socket in the kernel ?
src/sys/netgraph/bluetooth/socket/ng_btsocket.c (and the rest of the .c
files in there) are a good reference. Depeding on your needs netgraph
might even be the right place for the whole project.
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PRO
I also removed a few paragraphs in BUGS which are no longer true
(since we are using rmlocks for pfil(9)).
I'd appreciate review of the logic in pfil_list_add - just to make sure I
didn't botch it. Thanks.
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday 17 March 2008 11:29:15 Vadim Goncharov wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 00:05:36 +0100; Max Laier wrote about 'Review
please: pfil FIRST/LAST':
> > attached is a small diff to allow pfil(9) consumers to force a
> > sticky position on the head/tail of the processin
/home/build/src'.
>
> The error about ``Malformed conditional'' seems a bit odd too. Are you
> using /usr/bin/make? What version of FreeBSD is the build host
> running, and what version of the source tree have you checked out?
--
/"\ Best regards,
l archs (ia64) and could be more comfortable.
I remember that we tried GNU objcopy at first, but it didn't give what we
were looking for - don't recall details, though. Let me know if you have
questions about this.
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAI
branched directory. Yes, this is an expensive command.
You should rather check out the latest rev on the vendor tree before
doing an IFC and record that rev into the IFC commit message.
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier
tructs;
> - Do nothing: tweaking indent(1) for supporting this is so trivial
> that the few individuals interested in this can have their local
> version of indent.
>
> Can you please tell me your opinion about this?
>
> Thank you in advance,
> Romain
>
> PS: I als
isions/s * collision_overhead
~= -([avoided_]collisions/requests * collision_overhead)
assuming the collision_overhead (requiring memory operations) greatly
dominates the div_overhead.
So if there is a high collision rate and you can reasonably assert that
you will lower that significantly b
On Tuesday 11 May 2010 21:36:11 Eitan Adler wrote:
> My proposal is simple:
> require that any if statement that compares a constant to a mutable
> variable be written as
> if (constant == variable)
> instead of
> if (variable == constant)
>
> this prevents an extremely common programming error
>
On Saturday 05 June 2010 01:58:35 Adam PAPAI wrote:
> Why FreeBSD is supreme with 1 and 2 thread. And why is it 2 and 3 times
> slower with 4-8-16-32 threads compared to Debian? The first two tests (1
> thread and 2 thread) showed me that FreeBSD is supreme in I/O, but later
> tests showed me, that
Hello Nick,
On Wednesday 09 June 2010 20:17:43 Nick Rogers wrote:
> Is there something that can be done to speedup the call to
> if_indextoname(), or would it be worthwhile for me to submit a patch that
> adds the ability to skip the interface lookup as an arp(8) option?
how about the attached:
On Wednesday 09 June 2010 23:21:05 Max Laier wrote:
> Hello Nick,
>
> On Wednesday 09 June 2010 20:17:43 Nick Rogers wrote:
> > Is there something that can be done to speedup the call to
> > if_indextoname(), or would it be worthwhile for me to submit a patch that
> > a
t. So it was more the right timing, than the right list :-)
> Can this change make it into 8.1-RELEASE?
It looks like it might be too late, I'll ask once the HEAD commit is done, but
I wouldn't count on it.
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Max Laier wrote:
> > On Wednesd
On Thursday 10 June 2010 10:05:24 Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 10 June 2010 05:21, Max Laier wrote:
> >> Is there something that can be done to speedup the call to
> >> if_indextoname(), or would it be worthwhile for me to submit a patch
> >> that adds the ability to s
Hello Nick,
On Wednesday 09 June 2010 23:56:27 Nick Rogers wrote:
> Can this change make it into 8.1-RELEASE?
just MFCed it to stable/8. It will, however, not make it to 8.1-Release. As
it is not a bug fix, just a performance improvement, it is not considered a
candidate for the release branc
eep the both for backward compatibility and
it will probably take some fixing to hunt down all ported code that does
define betoh64 on its own.
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X http://pf4freebsd.lov
o set) or myself
directly.
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/ \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News
efers to their pool(9)
API. This is more or less the same as our uma(9). Whether or not this
is what you are looking for - I don't know.
> I wonder if this applies to FreeBSD too so I am investigating it a
> little.
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTEC
http://www.pcbsd.org/
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
s, ... all there at your fingertips.
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/ \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and New
.. you need additional bookkeeping
> to track that (see core map, free lists, ...)
Wikipedia really does a good job explaining all this.
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X htt
vel inspection is just in the making,
but all your other feature requests get a check mark.
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/ \ ASCII Ribbon
Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/ \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.or
-->ok<-- ok-2ok okok-4
^
|
rw_lock okok no ok-2okno-3
rm_lock okok no ok ok-2 no
--
/"\ Best regards,
quot;\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/ \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News
Inde
ing.
As you can see, the script is ready to checksum cvs and svn checkouts. If you
obtain your checkout from some local git/hg/svk/... mirror you must modify the
find excludes accordingly.
Let me know what you think.
--
/"\ Best regards, | [E
est regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/ \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org m
that:
1) svnversion is executable in /bin, /usr/bin or /usr/local/bin
2) there is a .svn directory in your SRCDIR
If that's the case, newvers.sh will add the output of it to uname:
"FreeBSD fbsd8 8.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT #4 r180876:183019M:..."
--
/"\ Best regard
t understood by looking at the following chart:
http://homepage.mac.com/quension/pf/flow.png
Is this the information you are looking for?
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X http://pf4freebsd.love2part
prediction and cache sizes). This would have to be measured as well,
of course. Maybe this should go to the project page? It's a good junior
kernel hacker project, I believe.
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/ \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News
Index: du.1
=
for the change itself.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> [1]
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2008-October/045698.html
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X http://pf4freebsd.love2par
On Wednesday 05 November 2008 03:31:26 Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Nov 2008 23:42:49 +0100, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi again,
> >
> > On Saturday 01 November 2008 21:14:42 I wrote:
> >> a thread on freebsd-stable@ [1] about problem
all, can
> anyone help on this one?
See http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?view=revision&revision=180510 for the
VLAN tag issue. Simply EVENTHANDLER_REGISTER a function in your driver to
update the hw-table on config/unconfig events. I hope this helps.
--
/"\ Be
ng from that.
You can identify all firmware(9) modules in the tree that require a license
ack, by grepping for "FIRMWARE_LICENSE" in the module Makefiles.
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
you page fault copystr() will kill the kernel. copyinstr() handles page
faults.
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/ \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/ \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
h
e to a relatively easy bug/feature that I
> can work on as a beginner C coder?
Check http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net
oding beyond my skill level.
Find a project you care about - no matter how difficult it
might seem - and start reading code & hacking. If you are truly passionate
about your project you can learn quite a bit in short time.
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is not a candidate for this
> inquiry since I'm not licensed to use it outside the office).
No idea about ClearCase, but SCCS and RCS are not too far away from SVN ...
natural progression.
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Ma
re supposed to be in the NTP context, but
it looks like you are looking for ntp_proto.c - convenient name, isn't it? ;)
--
/"\ Best regards, | mla...@freebsd.org
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mla..
o pfil_run_hooks() in the respective files).
From there the call path goes on to the ipfw_check_* functions defined in
netinet/ip_fw_pfil.c
Finally ipfw_chk() in netinet/ip_fw2.c where the ruleset is processed and
where you should add your required processing.
--
/"\ Best regards,
lse positive reports? If so, I think
sys/contrib/pf/net/pf.c:2931 is one. Seems cparser is confused by the union
in struct assignment, maybe? Or it suffers from the similar issue with
switch/case-statements as gcc. saddr is read from in all but the default
case.
--
/"\ Best regards
quot;\ Best regards, | mla...@freebsd.org
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mla...@efnet
/ \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.o
submitting 101 patches to rearrange 101
structs is certainly a wasted effort. However, if you take a good look at the
2000 holes, identify an interesting subset and submit a patch to fix that
subset ... that would be a worthwhile effort ... IMHO.
--
/"\ Best regards,
On Thursday 12 February 2009 17:42:19 Sam Leffler wrote:
> Max Laier wrote:
> > On Thursday 12 February 2009 15:08:22 Andrew Brampton wrote:
> >> So I ran the tool pahole over a 7.1 FreeBSD Kernel, and found that
> >> many of the struct had holes, and some of which could
tting corrupt once in RAM that's causing the crashes - all I know is
> with ~3Gb RAM - either by physically pulling SIMMs or using the hw.physmem
> option - it works fine.
>
> I tried booting 8.0-CURRENT-200812-amd64-disc1.iso - to see if anything was
> different with this hard
that's too small. I think we received many
> > complaints from people who want to increase UT_HOSTSIZE as well.
>
> Well, UT_HOSTSIZE can't hold a full sized IPv6 address.
RFC 1924 (still needs four more, but avoids ridiculously large UT_HOSTSIZE ;)
--
/"\ Bes
is wrong, and contradicts what I wrote further down. Just ignore
> it.
IIRC, kernel threads don't have root.
--
/"\ Best regards, | mla...@freebsd.org
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/
dump devices
> exist). Will FreeBSD report about panic somehow if it cannot create core
> dump?
You can try textdumps:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=textdump&manpath=FreeBSD+8-current
--
/"\ Best regards, | mla...@freebsd.org
\ / Max Laier
pointers can be set to an arrays of IPv4 and IPv6
addresses to be assigned to the prison, or NULL if none. IPv4 addresses
must be in network byte order.
So you'd do something like the following:
myjail.ip4s = 1;
inet_aton(ip, &ipaddr);
ed it for a portbuild test because it had been working correctly
> for me on a production system and then it failed on the cluster because
> the package build run jailed. And then I created a jail and in fact I
> could reproduce this but only in the jail.
LC_* set to a locale not availab
that does any of those operations are all side effects,11) which
are changes in the state of the execution environment. Evaluation of an
expression may produce side effects. At certain specified points in the
execution sequence called sequence points, all side effects of pre
x27;s a good addition
nonetheless. So please, go for it Ivan.
> Anyway, the feature looks nice! I'd like to have it...
>
> [1] I'm unsure how expensive it is compared to fork(1)-ing etc; I'd
> expect it's negligable but who knows...
>
--
/
On Friday 08 January 2010 17:13:29 John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday 08 January 2010 9:14:36 am Mark Tinguely wrote:
> > > You should use the pmap from the thread in the uio structure. Similar
> > > to this from the x86 bus_dma code:
> > >
> > > if (uio->uio_segflg == UIO_USERSPACE) {
> >
On Monday 11 January 2010 20:22:39 H.Fazaeli wrote:
> dear gurus
>
> man mutex(9) states that:
>
> "No mutexes should be held (except for Giant) across functions which
> access memory in userspace, such as copyin(9), copyout(9), uiomove(9),
> fuword(9), etc. No locks are needed when calling thes
On Friday 15 January 2010 12:26:06 q q wrote:
> I'm using pfil as packet filter for packet modifications.
>
> Is it possible to spawn new packets to network from pfil using mbuf?
You can call into ip_output with a new mbuf to send a new packet. See for
example pf_send_tcp in contrib/pf/net/pf.c
On Wednesday 24 February 2010 14:44:35 Andrey Zonov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I try allocated pointer to a pointer, and in it some pointers
> (important: size is 2 bytes), the pointers lose their boundaries.
> Why it can happen?
>
> Test program in attach.
Your test program is broken:
>#define S1 "
On Thursday 25 February 2010 23:46:03 Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> "Matthias Andree" writes:
> > Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes:
> > > char a[9] = { 'a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'f', 'g', 'h', 'i' };
> >
> > char a[9] = "abcdefghi";
> >
> > suffices. The compiler knows there isn't room for the terminal '
.freebsd.org/news/status/report-mar-2005-june-2005.html#TODO-list-for-volunteers
Not sure what the current status of the above is ...
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X http://pf4freebs
Problem Report Database
__
bridge.c retired
Contact: Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Contact: Andrew Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
As of September 27, the old bridge(4) implementation has been removed
from HEAD and will not be part of FreeBSD 7 and later. FreeBSD
nance on the current master)?
net/ifstated from ports might be what you are looking for.
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/ \ ASCI
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/ \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News
pgp2MCju4PFEY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
if you are just tiered
of writting reports?
In either case, please let me know so we can do something about it. If you
want to submit a report - deadline is extended to Wednesday (25th). Thanks!
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier
October-December 2005 Status Report
Introduction
This report is about the rather quite last quarter of 2005, with the
release of FreeBSD 6.0 and the holiday season things evolved in the
background. Nontheless, most exciting projects hit the tree (or are
going to very soon).
Upcom
st regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/ \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News
pgpDuL4M79BB9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
/www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-sample.xml
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/ \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News
pgpWR0YVRrXB3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
s currently in testing include startup script
support for fully asynchronous starting of dhclient which eliminates
the wait for link during startup and support for sending the system
hostname to the server when non is specified.
_
ase see:
http://www.freebsd.org/news/status/
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/ \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News
previous reports and submission details, please see:
> http://www.freebsd.org/news/status/
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/ \ ASCII Ribbon Ca
uite nice for cross builds as you can do the
expensive first pass on fast hardware and do the "installation" on the
target. It has the downside for __asm and the like.
I might be all wrong, though.
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier
have a really good turnout already, so we won't be waiting much longer.
Thanks.
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/ \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News
pgpxfb3KRcJoH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_
Update of the Linux userland infrastructure in the Ports Collection
Contact: Boris Samorodov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Contact: Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Contact: Emulation Mailinglist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
We updated the default linux base por
tap0 and fxp0. if_bridge(4) offers extensive means of packet
filtering described in the man page in great detail.
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/ \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News
pgp4cxWeloppn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Monday 21 August 2006 18:26, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> is there style(9)-like guide for writing FreeBSD man pages ?
"man mdoc" aka GROFF_MDOC(7) is the closest one I can think of.
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier
firmware(9) subsystem to load the firmware image,
so you will have to change to net/iwi-firmware-kmod from ports - as
described in UPDATING. The latest firmware version - IIRC is 3.0.
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #
ward to reading your reports.
See you at EuroBSDCon 2006 in Milan: http://www.eurobsdcon.org/
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/ \ ASCII Ribbon Campai
e.
It seems that you can set KODIR to "/boot/kernel.foo" in order to install
elsewhere. See sys/conf/kern.post.mk for details.
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X http://pf4freebsd.love2par
ion. It doesn't help and just
increases the frustration of everybody. Thanks.
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/ \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
On Wednesday 27 September 2006 14:23, Max Laier wrote:
> Submissions are due by 6 October, 2006. Submission details can be
> found on http://www.freebsd.org/news/status/
>
> As always, this is by no means limited to FreeBSD committers, but a
> call to report news and status ab
ers/danny/freebsd/iscsi-17.5.tar.bz2 is that the
one you were thinking about?
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/ \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
On Friday 10 November 2006 10:37, Massimo Lusetti wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 22:39 +0100, Gábor Kövesdán wrote:
> > Unfortunately, it seems that this is still that unfinished driver from
> > Damien, that circulates on the net everywhere, but it only works for
> > some lucky people. As for me, I
cket6
--
/"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/ \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News
pgpspYaBpu9CL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tuesday 14 November 2006 20:09, David Malone wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 05:09:20PM +0100, Max Laier wrote:
> > Any ideas? Any papers that deal with this problem?
>
> Assuming you don't want to use one of the standard cryptographic
> ones (which I can imagi
On Wednesday 15 November 2006 12:26, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Max Laier wrote:
> > David Malone wrote:
> > > Assuming you don't want to use one of the standard cryptographic
> > > ones (which I can imagine being a bit slow for something done
> > > per-p
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo