On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:58:55PM -0500, Ben Kelly wrote:
>
> I actually have not measured my bandwidth to validate dummynet. I have
> simply observed these messages repeating in my log:
>
> dummynet: OUCH! pipe should have been idle!
>
> Under normal conditions I don't really need the dumm
Oleg Bulyzhin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:58:55PM -0500, Ben Kelly wrote:
>> I actually have not measured my bandwidth to validate dummynet. I have
>> simply observed these messages repeating in my log:
>>
>> dummynet: OUCH! pipe should have been idle!
>>
>> Under normal conditions I do
On Dec 1, 2009, at 2:33 PM, Kevin Smith wrote:
> Oleg Bulyzhin wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:58:55PM -0500, Ben Kelly wrote:
>>> I actually have not measured my bandwidth to validate dummynet. I have
>>> simply observed these messages repeating in my log:
>>>
>>> dummynet: OUCH! pipe s
Kevin Smith wrote:
Oleg Bulyzhin wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:58:55PM -0500, Ben Kelly wrote:
I actually have not measured my bandwidth to validate dummynet. I have simply
observed these messages repeating in my log:
dummynet: OUCH! pipe should have been idle!
Under normal conditions
