Re: [netmap/vale-ctl] when could process packet

2014-09-17 Thread upyzl
(forgot cc before) Hi, Jim thanks for reply this is my graduate design project my aim is to implement a simple software switch based on openflow using FreeBSD netmap as network I/O framework besides, I'm succeed doing on bridge.c at 2 interfaces add like /* Func: int main()

[Bug 193053] ixgbe(4) IXGBE_LEGACY_TX + ALTQ path broken

2014-09-17 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193053 --- Comment #3 from ncrog...@gmail.com --- >From what I can tell, the changes in the newer ixgbe driver here: https://downloadcenter.intel.com/Detail_Desc.aspx?DwnldID=14688 Fix two of three problems with the IXGBE_LEGACY_TX path that I ch

Re: [netmap/vale-ctl] when could process packet

2014-09-17 Thread Jim Thompson
Jaye, I’d really like to see this work happen. Let me know if I can help. Jim > On Sep 17, 2014, at 9:39 PM, upyzl wrote: > > Hi, > > I think it's right place to talk about FreeBSD 10 - netmap question > (location at FreeBSD 10: /usr/src/tools/tools/netmap ; with kernel device > netmap on) >

[Bug 193053] ixgbe(4) IXGBE_LEGACY_TX + ALTQ path broken

2014-09-17 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193053 Adrian Chadd changed: What|Removed |Added CC||adr...@freebsd.org --- Comment #2 f

[netmap/vale-ctl] when could process packet

2014-09-17 Thread upyzl
Hi, I think it's right place to talk about FreeBSD 10 - netmap question (location at FreeBSD 10: /usr/src/tools/tools/netmap ; with kernel device netmap on) I'm (entry) study on openflow software switch based on netmap/vale It seems very simple in vale-ctl.c and hard to add features for packet p

[Bug 193053] ixgbe(4) IXGBE_LEGACY_TX + ALTQ path broken

2014-09-17 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193053 Eric Joyner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ricer...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 fr

Re: Multipath TCP for FreeBSD v0.4

2014-09-17 Thread Alfred Perlstein
Github offers an excellent system with comments and all that jazz for making pull requests. Super simple to use. On 9/17/14 3:34 PM, Eric Joyner wrote: As a random person without commit privileges, I hope so, too. --- - Eric Joyner On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 8:44 AM, Sean Bruno wrote: On Wed

Re: Multipath TCP for FreeBSD v0.4

2014-09-17 Thread Eric Joyner
As a random person without commit privileges, I hope so, too. --- - Eric Joyner On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 8:44 AM, Sean Bruno wrote: > On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 12:58 +1000, Nigel Williams wrote: > > On 17/09/14 08:48, Sean Bruno wrote: > > > On Mon, 2014-09-08 at 11:32 +1000, Nigel Williams wrote: >

Re: [RFC] Patch to add Software/Generic Segmentation Offload (GSO) support in FreeBSD

2014-09-17 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On 09/17/14 20:18, Stefano Garzarella wrote: Hi Adrian, the results that I sent, regard just one flow, but I can try with two simultaneous flows and I'll send you the results. Thanks, Stefano Hi Stefano, You might have seen the discussion about TSO. Is it so that the proposed GSO feature on

Re: [RFC] Patch to add Software/Generic Segmentation Offload (GSO) support in FreeBSD

2014-09-17 Thread Stefano Garzarella
Hi Adrian, the results that I sent, regard just one flow, but I can try with two simultaneous flows and I'll send you the results. Thanks, Stefano 2014-09-17 19:27 GMT+02:00 Adrian Chadd : > Hi! > > Cool! > > How many flows were you testing with? Just one or two? > > It's for outbound, so it's n

Re: [RFC] Patch to add Software/Generic Segmentation Offload (GSO) support in FreeBSD

2014-09-17 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi! Cool! How many flows were you testing with? Just one or two? It's for outbound, so it's not _as_ big a deal as it is for inbound, but it'd still be nice to know. -a On 17 September 2014 01:27, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > Hi all, > I have recently worked, during my master’s thesis with t

Re: Multipath TCP for FreeBSD v0.4

2014-09-17 Thread Sean Bruno
On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 12:58 +1000, Nigel Williams wrote: > On 17/09/14 08:48, Sean Bruno wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-09-08 at 11:32 +1000, Nigel Williams wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> We recently released a new tech report "Design Overview of > Multipath TCP > >> version 0.4 for FreeBSD-11" [1]. The report

ping6 -c broken after svn r269180

2014-09-17 Thread John Hay
Hi Guys, After svn r269180 and MFC to 10-stable r269800 and also to 9- and 8-, ping6 -c have an unintended behaviour. Previously if you did "ping6 -c 3 ", it would send the 3 packets, report the outcome and exit. Now, if the machine to be pinged, does not answer, ping6 will just sit and wait until

Re: ixgbe IXGBE_LEGACY_TX breaks build (patch/fix included)

2014-09-17 Thread Nick Rogers
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Nick Rogers wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm not surprised the legacy tx path has bitrotted there. >> >> Please file a bug with this - https://bugs.freebsd.org/submit/ - and >> then just keep poking people unt

Oce driver fixes

2014-09-17 Thread Borja Marcos
Hello, Back in July there was a discussion on -current about serious problems with the "oce" driver for Emulex 10 GbE cards. Stefano Garzarella supplied a patch that fixed the problems (at least for me). Is this patch planned to go to -current and -stable, ideally before 10.1? At least for me

[RFC] Patch to add Software/Generic Segmentation Offload (GSO) support in FreeBSD

2014-09-17 Thread Stefano Garzarella
Hi all, I have recently worked, during my master’s thesis with the supervision of Prof. Luigi Rizzo, on a project to add GSO (Generic Segmentation Offload) support in FreeBSD. I will present this project at EuroBSDcon 2014, in Sofia (Bulgaria) on September 28, 2014. Following is a brief descriptio