Hello,
Sylpheed 2.7.1 does not compile on amd64:
r...@kg-v2# cd /usr/ports/mail/sylpheed2
r...@kg-v2# make
===> Building for sylpheed-2.7.1
gmake all-recursive
gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/mail/sylpheed2/work/sylpheed-2.7.1'
Making all in ac
gmake[2]: Entering directory
`/usr/ports/m
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
>> Miroslav Lachman wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I have another case, where portmaster did not update dependency.
>>>
>>> I started with the following list of available updates
>>>
>>> r...@elsa ~/# portmaster fetch update && pkg_version -vIL =
>>> apache-2.2.11_7
Doug Barton wrote:
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
I have another case, where portmaster did not update dependency.
I started with the following list of available updates
r...@elsa ~/# portmaster fetch update && pkg_version -vIL =
apache-2.2.11_7 < needs updating (index has 2.2.13)
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> I have another case, where portmaster did not update dependency.
>
> I started with the following list of available updates
>
> r...@elsa ~/# portmaster fetch update && pkg_version -vIL =
> apache-2.2.11_7 < needs updating (index has 2.2.13)
Portmaster d
Boris Kochergin wrote:
James Bailie wrote:
Ports Readers,
I'm the maintainer of lang/munger, and it has been marked broken on
Sparc64 because it won't link. I need to see the compiler output
to fix the problem, but I don't have access to this architecture.
Therefore, I would like to ask anyone
James Bailie wrote:
Ports Readers,
I'm the maintainer of lang/munger, and it has been marked broken on
Sparc64 because it won't link. I need to see the compiler output
to fix the problem, but I don't have access to this architecture.
Therefore, I would like to ask anyone out there running this
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 03:19:37PM -0400, Yarema wrote:
> Wesley Shields wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 01:06:23PM -0400, Yarema wrote:
> >> Wesley Shields wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 01:47:42PM -0400, Yarema wrote:
> RW wrote:
> > When I upgraded my ports yesterday Dovecot de
Doug Barton wrote:
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
[...]
I can confirm that bug was fixed in 2.10, it passed my test with -r
jpeg-7 ;)
Also good news. :) I'm actually pretty confident at this point that
this bug was the cause of most, if not all of the "oops, portmaster
missed a dependency update
James Bailie wrote:
> I'm the maintainer of lang/munger, and it has been marked broken on
> Sparc64 because it won't link. I need to see the compiler output
> to fix the problem, but I don't have access to this architecture.
There might be some useful logs on pointyhat in this case. Check out
htt
Ports Readers,
I'm the maintainer of lang/munger, and it has been marked broken on
Sparc64 because it won't link. I need to see the compiler output
to fix the problem, but I don't have access to this architecture.
Therefore, I would like to ask anyone out there running this
platform to do me the
Synopsis: Wrong plist generated if nonstandard MANPREFIX and PREFIX used.
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports->freebsd-ports-bugs
Responsible-Changed-By: itetcu
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Aug 29 10:20:44 UTC 2009
Responsible-Changed-Why:
don't assign it to ports ML
http://www.freebsd.o
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Yesterday I upgraded a Dovecot installation from 1.1.16 to 1.2.4 and
spent a few hours trying to figure out why GSSAPI authentication was
failing. It turned out to be due to some extra username checking
introduced to Dovecot just prior to the 1.2.4 release.
If I set 'auth_debug = yes' in dovecot.
Noone cares?
On (2009-08-22 22:26), Robert Nagy wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> Basically - luasocket defines buffer_init(); which is common enough to be
> defined
> elsewhere and it is defined in mod_magnet, so you end up with a SIGSEGV.
> The attatched patch solves the issue by renaming the buffer_* func
14 matches
Mail list logo