Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org writes:
Now, as to how we can convince CMake to put the -I/usr/local/include at
the end... Maybe we should just patch the CMakeLists.txt, but that is a
rather ugly solution. :)
Try using
CPPFLAGS+=-isystem${LOCALBASE}/include
gcc(1) (and clang)
On Wed, 05 Sep 2012 16:45:49 +0200
O. Hartmann ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
Hello.
FreeBSD has fallen back far behind the standards of modern scientific
computing and I dsperately look for solutions having OpenCL support on
FreeBSD anyway.
I stumbled into this project
On 09/06/12 12:16, Matthieu Volat wrote:
On Wed, 05 Sep 2012 16:45:49 +0200
O. Hartmann ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
Hello.
FreeBSD has fallen back far behind the standards of modern scientific
computing and I dsperately look for solutions having OpenCL support on
FreeBSD
On 09/06/12 12:16, Matthieu Volat wrote:
On Wed, 05 Sep 2012 16:45:49 +0200
O. Hartmann ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
Hello.
FreeBSD has fallen back far behind the standards of modern scientific
computing and I dsperately look for solutions having OpenCL support on
FreeBSD
On 09/06/12 13:33, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
RUN_DEPENDS=
${LOCALBASE}/lib/libatomic_ops.a:${PORTSDIR}/devel/libatomic_ops
Why did you not add it as LIB_DEPENDS or BUILD_DEPENDS ?
Btw, any static library is always linked into the binary and
therefore can by definition not be a RUN_DEPENDS,
On 2012-09-05 16:45, O. Hartmann wrote:
...
Well, I tried LLVM/CLANG, but Cmake of the sources fairly fails many
checks especuially for OpenMP.
Yes, it is currently not supported. I am not sure if there are serious
attempts to add it.
Using clang++ requisites the usage of the
new libc++
On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 13:14 +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
I tried to add
RUN_DEPENDS=
${LOCALBASE}/lib/libatomic_ops.a:${PORTSDIR}/devel/libatomic_ops
to my provided Makefile, but this doesn't install the port
devel/libatomic_ops.
This is weird and inconsistent. I follow exact the steps
Hello Dimitry,
thanks for your response and patches.
On 09/06/12 14:51, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-09-05 16:45, O. Hartmann wrote:
...
Well, I tried LLVM/CLANG, but Cmake of the sources fairly fails many
checks especuially for OpenMP.
Yes, it is currently not supported. I am not sure
On 09/06/12 14:51, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-09-05 16:45, O. Hartmann wrote:
...
Well, I tried LLVM/CLANG, but Cmake of the sources fairly fails many
checks especuially for OpenMP.
Yes, it is currently not supported. I am not sure if there are serious
attempts to add it.
Using
On 2012-09-06 20:28, O. Hartmann wrote:
...
With the patch for Mk/bsd.cmake.mk attached, I can not compile the port
with CLANG, compilation results in
[ 15%] Building CXX object src/CMakeFiles/FreeOCL.dir/image.cpp.o
/usr/ports/devel/freeocl/work/FreeOCL-0.3.6-Source/src/image.cpp:442:27:
Hello.
FreeBSD has fallen back far behind the standards of modern scientific
computing and I dsperately look for solutions having OpenCL support on
FreeBSD anyway.
I stumbled into this project recently:
FreeOCL at
http://code.google.com/p/freeocl/
or the sources located at
11 matches
Mail list logo
