On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 08:03:32PM +0100, Michal Varga wrote:
> >>> Well, it's a dedicated blade after all :) And those 8 cores seem
> >>> pretty nasty, I'm envious.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Well, afaik I even cannot use more than one CPU when building ports.
> >> There were plans/rumors that this would cha
Boris Kochergin wrote:
> Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > Michal Varga wrote:
> >
> >
> > > > # pkg_info | wc -l
> >>>457
> > > > #
> > > >
> > > > And this machine is even my package-building station!
> > > >
> > > > Anyway, portupgrade -af took 45 minutes. g
> > > >
> >>>
> > > Well,
>>> Well, it's a dedicated blade after all :) And those 8 cores seem
>>> pretty nasty, I'm envious.
>>>
>>
>> Well, afaik I even cannot use more than one CPU when building ports.
>> There were plans/rumors that this would change. Does anyone know more
>> about it?
>>
Sure you can, as Boris (below)
Helmut Schneider wrote:
Michal Varga wrote:
# pkg_info | wc -l
457
#
And this machine is even my package-building station!
Anyway, portupgrade -af took 45 minutes. g
Well, it's a dedicated blade after all :) And those 8 cores seem
pretty nasty, I'm envious.
Well, afaik
Michal Varga wrote:
> > # pkg_info | wc -l
> > 457
> > #
> >
> > And this machine is even my package-building station!
> >
> > Anyway, portupgrade -af took 45 minutes. g
> >
> Well, it's a dedicated blade after all :) And those 8 cores seem
> pretty nasty, I'm envious.
Well, afaik I even c
> # pkg_info | wc -l
> 457
> #
>
> And this machine is even my package-building station!
>
> Anyway, portupgrade -af took 45 minutes. *g*
>
Well, it's a dedicated blade after all :) And those 8 cores seem
pretty nasty, I'm envious.
That 800+ installed ports are for a regular desktop system,
C
Michal Varga wrote:
> I'm not a heavy Perl user, but I don't remember anything ever melting
> "too much", while doing it this way. Of course, there are things like
> irssi, that break -every time- you reinstall Perl (even the same
> version), but one gets used to it quickly. Then there is the rest
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> # pkg_info -R perl-threaded-5.8.9_3 | grep -v ^p5
> Information for perl-threaded-5.8.9_3:
>
> Required by:
> amavisd-new-2.6.4_4,1
> apache-2.2.14_5
> bsdpan-SNMP-Extension-PassPersist-0.03
> gamin-0.1.10_3
> gio-fam-backend-2.22.4
> glib
Michal Varga wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Helmut Schneider
> wrote:
> > [...]
> > Currently the only solution seems to remove perl.5.8 which as a
> > result deletes all dependencies which requires all ports to be
> > reinstalled.
> >
>
> No way, only if you decide to deinstall ever
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> Helmut Schneider wrote:
>
>
> > ===> perl-threaded-5.10.1 conflicts with installed package(s):
> > perl-threaded-5.8.9_3
> >
> > They install files into the same place.
> > Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1).
> > *** Error code 1
>
> Yes. Th
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> [...]
> Currently the only solution seems to remove perl.5.8 which as a result
> deletes all dependencies which requires *all* ports to be reinstalled.
>
No way, only if you decide to deinstall everything recursively. What about:
# pkg_d
Helmut Schneider wrote:
===> perl-threaded-5.10.1 conflicts with installed package(s):
perl-threaded-5.8.9_3
They install files into the same place.
Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1).
*** Error code 1
Yes. This has been the subject of some debate on the questi..
Hi,
/usr/ports/UPDATING says:
portupgrade -o lang/perl5.10 -f perl-5.8.\*
# BATCH=YES portupgrade -o lang/perl5.10 -f perl-threaded-5.8.\*
---> Upgrading 'perl-threaded-5.8.9_3' to 'perl-threaded-5.10.1'
(lang/perl5.10)
---> Building '/usr/ports/lang/perl5.10' with make flags:
-DWITH_THREADS
=
13 matches
Mail list logo
