On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:00:04 +0100
Thomas Zander wrote:
> > But the takeaway is that we can't expect the PR submitters, or even
> > port maintainers, to get anything right. It sure makes life easier
> > when they do, but we can't take it for granted.
> > As committers, we are that QA step.
>
> A
update
(1.0.r20111218) conflicts with devel/ncurses
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:21:42 +0100
From:
To: , ,
,
Synopsis: multimedia/mplayer: last update (1.0.r20111218) conflicts with
devel/ncurses
Responsible-Changed-From-To: ehaupt->scheidell
Responsible-Changed-By: ehaupt
Responsi
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 16:35, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> tell me you want me to revert this patch, and do a portepoch.
> the solution would be for the submitter to work with the maintainer on a
> solution, or am I supposed to fix this without reversing this?
Let's all calm down first :-)
Please
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:35:12AM -0500, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> the solution would be for the submitter to work with the maintainer
> on a solution, or am I supposed to fix this without reversing this?
In general each of us, as committers, is responsible for whatever side-
effects of the chan
On 1/19/12 12:04 PM, Mark Linimon wrote:
So if there's breakage, then it needs to be first understood, then
dealt with. If there is no other way than the horrible backout/PORTEPOCH
dance, then so be it.
But the takeaway is that we can't expect the PR submitters, or even
port maintainers, to g
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 18:04, Mark Linimon wrote:
> So if there's breakage, then it needs to be first understood, then
> dealt with. If there is no other way than the horrible backout/PORTEPOCH
> dance, then so be it.
That's correct.
However I think that in this situation there was no need to
On 19/01/2012 18:00, Thomas Zander wrote:
> It was not the first temporary build problem that one of
> the 15k ports has and it certainly won't be the last.
23k
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 19:03, Matthew Seaman
wrote:
> On 19/01/2012 18:00, Thomas Zander wrote:
>> It was not the first temporary build problem that one of
>> the 15k ports has and it certainly won't be the last.
>
> 23k
Sorry, I must have lost count some time in 2005 or so :-)
Riggs
_
