Re: kde5/qt5 problem

2020-04-16 Thread The Doctor via freebsd-ports
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 05:08:59PM +0200, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > On Thursday, 16 April 2020 00:05:02 CEST The Doctor wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 09:20:17PM +0200, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > > > Qt ports are annoying like that; it's an incompatibility between pre-5.14 > > > and (current) 5.

Re: kde5/qt5 problem

2020-04-16 Thread Pau Amma
On 2020-04-16 17:08, Adriaan de Groot wrote: On Thursday, 16 April 2020 00:05:02 CEST The Doctor wrote: All right, just that I use portmaster. How can I use poudriere for this? https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/testing-poudriere.html That's from the perspec

Re: kde5/qt5 problem

2020-04-16 Thread Adriaan de Groot
On Thursday, 16 April 2020 00:05:02 CEST The Doctor wrote: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 09:20:17PM +0200, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > > Qt ports are annoying like that; it's an incompatibility between pre-5.14 > > and (current) 5.14 where it picks up the wrong CMake support bits. > > Uninstall Qt < 5.14

Re: kde5/qt5 problem

2020-04-15 Thread The Doctor via freebsd-ports
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 09:20:17PM +0200, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > Qt ports are annoying like that; it's an incompatibility between pre-5.14 and > (current) 5.14 where it picks up the wrong CMake support bits. Uninstall Qt < > 5.14, then build Qt 5.14. Or use poudriere, which builds in a clean

re: kde5/qt5 problem

2020-04-15 Thread Adriaan de Groot
Qt ports are annoying like that; it's an incompatibility between pre-5.14 and (current) 5.14 where it picks up the wrong CMake support bits. Uninstall Qt < 5.14, then build Qt 5.14. Or use poudriere, which builds in a clean environment. [ade] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally sign